Wednesday, 8 September 2010
Saturday, 21 August 2010
Monday, 19 July 2010
Muslim bus drivers refuse to let blind people with guide dogs on board
Blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their 'unclean' guide dogs.
One pensioner, a cancer sufferer, told how had twice been confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog, and had also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
The problem to carry guide dogs on religious grounds has become so widespread that the matter was raised in the House of Lords last week, prompting transport minister Norman Baker to warn that a religious objection was not a reason to eject a passenger with a well-behaved guide dog.
One pensioner, a cancer sufferer, told how had twice been confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog, and had also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
The problem to carry guide dogs on religious grounds has become so widespread that the matter was raised in the House of Lords last week, prompting transport minister Norman Baker to warn that a religious objection was not a reason to eject a passenger with a well-behaved guide dog.
While drivers can use their discretion to refuse to carry non-disabled passengers with dogs, they are compelled to accept guide dogs under disability discrimination law.
Yesterday both the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the National Federation of the Blind confirmed the problem was common, and, according to the latter organisation was 'getting worse'.
The tension stems from a strand of Islamic teaching which warns against contact with dogs because the animal's saliva was considered to be impure, the Muslim Council of Britain said.
It urged Muslims to show tolerance and common sense over the issue.
'We need to be flexible on this,' a spokesman said. 'Muslim drivers should have no hesitation in allowing guide dogs into their bus or car.
'If a dog does lick you, it's not the end of the world. Just go home and wash yourself.'
George Herridge, 73, a retired hospital maintenance manager, told the Daily Mail he was 'stunned' to be twice asked by bus drivers to leave their vehicles because of his guide dog Andy, a black Labrador.
Mr Herridge, who lives with wife Janet, 69, in Tilehurst, Reading, said that on the first occasion two years ago, he got off at the request of a Muslim driver because some Muslim children on board were 'screaming' because of the dog.
He found himself in a similar scenario in May last year, when a Muslim woman and her children became 'hysterical'. Mr Herridge this time refused the driver's request to alight.
He complained to the bus company which launched an investigation. It later informed him the matter had been dealt with 'internally'.
Jill Allen-King, spokesman for the NFB, said she had been repeatedly left on the kerb by Muslim taxi drivers who refused to take her dog.
One cab driver told her he would have to 'go home now and wash myself' when she tried to enter his car with her dog.
Mr Baker yesterday warned bus and cab companies that, while there were within their rights to ask a passenger to leave if the dog was causing a nuisance, it was 'much more questionable to be asked to remove a dog for religious reasons'.
He added: 'One person's freedom is someone else's restriction.'
In 2006, Muslim minicab driver Abdul Rasheed Majekodumni was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 costs by magistrates in Marylebone, central London, after being prosecuted for failing to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act when he refused to take a blind passenger because her guide dog was 'unclean'.
Yesterday both the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the National Federation of the Blind confirmed the problem was common, and, according to the latter organisation was 'getting worse'.
The tension stems from a strand of Islamic teaching which warns against contact with dogs because the animal's saliva was considered to be impure, the Muslim Council of Britain said.
It urged Muslims to show tolerance and common sense over the issue.
'We need to be flexible on this,' a spokesman said. 'Muslim drivers should have no hesitation in allowing guide dogs into their bus or car.
'If a dog does lick you, it's not the end of the world. Just go home and wash yourself.'
George Herridge, 73, a retired hospital maintenance manager, told the Daily Mail he was 'stunned' to be twice asked by bus drivers to leave their vehicles because of his guide dog Andy, a black Labrador.
Mr Herridge, who lives with wife Janet, 69, in Tilehurst, Reading, said that on the first occasion two years ago, he got off at the request of a Muslim driver because some Muslim children on board were 'screaming' because of the dog.
He found himself in a similar scenario in May last year, when a Muslim woman and her children became 'hysterical'. Mr Herridge this time refused the driver's request to alight.
He complained to the bus company which launched an investigation. It later informed him the matter had been dealt with 'internally'.
Jill Allen-King, spokesman for the NFB, said she had been repeatedly left on the kerb by Muslim taxi drivers who refused to take her dog.
One cab driver told her he would have to 'go home now and wash myself' when she tried to enter his car with her dog.
Mr Baker yesterday warned bus and cab companies that, while there were within their rights to ask a passenger to leave if the dog was causing a nuisance, it was 'much more questionable to be asked to remove a dog for religious reasons'.
He added: 'One person's freedom is someone else's restriction.'
In 2006, Muslim minicab driver Abdul Rasheed Majekodumni was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 costs by magistrates in Marylebone, central London, after being prosecuted for failing to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act when he refused to take a blind passenger because her guide dog was 'unclean'.
Sunday, 18 July 2010
500 Staff and £40,000 on Chauffeur Fees: This Is the Organisation That Seeks to Destroy the BNP and the British indigenous people
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has a staff of over 500 and its Lenin-worshipping immigrant-origin boss spent £40,000 of taxpayers’ money to ferry him seven miles a day to his office, a financial review of that organisation has revealed.
EHCR head Trevor Phillips, already dogged by accusations of waste, mismanagement and blatant political interference in staff appointments, is said to be staggering under the weight of the new allegations which reveal precisely how outrageous his own personal “expense” claims are.
Despite earning £120,000 for this made-up race Gestapo job, Mr Phillips claimed more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to take him each day from his home in north London to the EHRC’s office near London Bridge.
The journey takes approximately 25 minutes, which is only ten minutes faster than a commute on public transport which would cost a few hundred pounds per year at most.
The embarrassed Mr Phillips, who used to boast about the bust of Lenin he kept on his desk, only stopped using the chauffeur car in May after he realised the review had cottoned on to his little earner.
The report, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject EHRC management failings.
Earlier, Mr Phillips was the subject of a wave of criticism and attacks from within his own organisation.
Amongst the allegations made against Mr Phillips were that he had “lost the faith of minority groups” and that he had “played the race card to stay in post.”
Last year, one EHRC commissioner, Kay Hampton, resigned in protest after saying that Mr Phillips had said his enemies were trying to oust him because he was a “black man.”
“Nobody is prepared to challenge Trevor for fear of being accused of racism. He has already played the race card in the commission,” Ms Hampton said.
The Liberal Democrat’s “Lord” Dholakia was also quoted as saying that “Mr Phillips has lost the confidence of the black and Asian community.”
Amongst the long list of shady EHRC dealings include the revelation that it unlawfully awarded a £300,000 contract to a company run by one of Mr Phillips' close professional friends.
Juniper TV, a company headed by Dr Samir Shah, who has known Phillips since they worked at LWT in the 1980, was awarded a contract in 2007 to produce My Story, a 30-minute video in which the public and celebrities talked about "difference."
An internal audit found EU procurement rules had not been followed, concerning whether or not the tender for the project should have been advertised across Europe.
The EHRC’s commissioners earn an annual salary of more than £100,000 each.
And this is the organisation which has set as its goal the destruction of the British National Party, all because the BNP is the only political party which dares to stand up for the rights of the indigenous people of these islands.
EHCR head Trevor Phillips, already dogged by accusations of waste, mismanagement and blatant political interference in staff appointments, is said to be staggering under the weight of the new allegations which reveal precisely how outrageous his own personal “expense” claims are.
Despite earning £120,000 for this made-up race Gestapo job, Mr Phillips claimed more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to take him each day from his home in north London to the EHRC’s office near London Bridge.
The journey takes approximately 25 minutes, which is only ten minutes faster than a commute on public transport which would cost a few hundred pounds per year at most.
The embarrassed Mr Phillips, who used to boast about the bust of Lenin he kept on his desk, only stopped using the chauffeur car in May after he realised the review had cottoned on to his little earner.
The report, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject EHRC management failings.
Earlier, Mr Phillips was the subject of a wave of criticism and attacks from within his own organisation.
Amongst the allegations made against Mr Phillips were that he had “lost the faith of minority groups” and that he had “played the race card to stay in post.”
Last year, one EHRC commissioner, Kay Hampton, resigned in protest after saying that Mr Phillips had said his enemies were trying to oust him because he was a “black man.”
“Nobody is prepared to challenge Trevor for fear of being accused of racism. He has already played the race card in the commission,” Ms Hampton said.
The Liberal Democrat’s “Lord” Dholakia was also quoted as saying that “Mr Phillips has lost the confidence of the black and Asian community.”
Amongst the long list of shady EHRC dealings include the revelation that it unlawfully awarded a £300,000 contract to a company run by one of Mr Phillips' close professional friends.
Juniper TV, a company headed by Dr Samir Shah, who has known Phillips since they worked at LWT in the 1980, was awarded a contract in 2007 to produce My Story, a 30-minute video in which the public and celebrities talked about "difference."
An internal audit found EU procurement rules had not been followed, concerning whether or not the tender for the project should have been advertised across Europe.
The EHRC’s commissioners earn an annual salary of more than £100,000 each.
And this is the organisation which has set as its goal the destruction of the British National Party, all because the BNP is the only political party which dares to stand up for the rights of the indigenous people of these islands.
Sunday, 11 July 2010
Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics
Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics
The utter failure of multiculturalism and the anti-white paranoia which it engenders has been illustrated once again with an internal report from one of Britain’s major intelligence agencies which blames whites for the unwillingness of ethnics to spy on their own people.
GCHQ: Apparently a nest of racists?According to a review of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) which is the centre for the Government's Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) activities, there are “too few” ethnic staff members and the reason for this is, of course, the ubiquitous “racism” of white staff members.
According to reports, the “Capability Review” was authorised by the head of the civil service, Sir Gus O'Donnell, and published in January. It has only now been leaked to the press.
The review claimed that anti-terrorism efforts are undermined by a failure to recruit “enough ethnic minority staff.”
Apparently GCHQ has a "very small pool" of black and Asian staff and all of their senior staff is white.
This is problematic because of the Islamist nature of the terrorist threat which Britain faces. As a result, most of the communications which are intercepted by GCHQ are in Urdu and Arabic.
A lack of officers with specialist knowledge of these languages is apparently “harming efforts to spot codes and cultural nuances in intercepted conversations.”
As is by now usual for the multicultural fanatics who make up the establishment, any excuse but the truth is created to try and explain this situation.
The simple, most obvious, and clearly truthful reason is that very few ethnics want to spy on their brethren, especially when all opinion polls, anecdotal evidence and public pronouncements from Muslim organisations show that there is a very large degree of sympathy for Islamists amongst the target communities.
Rather than admit this obvious truth, the brainwashed liberals running the establishment resorted instead to their old standby: blame whitey.
In a shockingly unfair attack on the white staff at the GCHQ in Cheltenham, the review said there was a “racist culture” in the organisation which prevented ethnics from joining.
One ethnic staff member’s bizarre “evidence” which was used as “proof” of this slur on the white staff was that “ethnic minority employees had to work harder than white colleagues and for less reward.”
This tactic of always blaming white people for everything when the true causes clearly lie elsewhere runs like a golden thread through the entire multicultural establishment’s reasoning.
If black people are stopped and searched more often than any other group by the police, it is not because they commit more crime, but because the “the police are racist.”
If ethnics are jailed more often than whites, it is not because they commit more crime, but it is because the “judicial system is racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in schools or universities, it is because “educational institutions are racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in jobs, it is because “employers are racist.” The list is endless.
And now, because ethnics do not want to spy on their own communities, it is because the “white staff at GCHQ are racist.”
This nonsense has to stop before it utterly destroys Britain. Only the British National Party dares to stand up and opposed this politically correct anti-white Marxist claptrap.
The utter failure of multiculturalism and the anti-white paranoia which it engenders has been illustrated once again with an internal report from one of Britain’s major intelligence agencies which blames whites for the unwillingness of ethnics to spy on their own people.
GCHQ: Apparently a nest of racists?According to a review of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) which is the centre for the Government's Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) activities, there are “too few” ethnic staff members and the reason for this is, of course, the ubiquitous “racism” of white staff members.
According to reports, the “Capability Review” was authorised by the head of the civil service, Sir Gus O'Donnell, and published in January. It has only now been leaked to the press.
The review claimed that anti-terrorism efforts are undermined by a failure to recruit “enough ethnic minority staff.”
Apparently GCHQ has a "very small pool" of black and Asian staff and all of their senior staff is white.
This is problematic because of the Islamist nature of the terrorist threat which Britain faces. As a result, most of the communications which are intercepted by GCHQ are in Urdu and Arabic.
A lack of officers with specialist knowledge of these languages is apparently “harming efforts to spot codes and cultural nuances in intercepted conversations.”
As is by now usual for the multicultural fanatics who make up the establishment, any excuse but the truth is created to try and explain this situation.
The simple, most obvious, and clearly truthful reason is that very few ethnics want to spy on their brethren, especially when all opinion polls, anecdotal evidence and public pronouncements from Muslim organisations show that there is a very large degree of sympathy for Islamists amongst the target communities.
Rather than admit this obvious truth, the brainwashed liberals running the establishment resorted instead to their old standby: blame whitey.
In a shockingly unfair attack on the white staff at the GCHQ in Cheltenham, the review said there was a “racist culture” in the organisation which prevented ethnics from joining.
One ethnic staff member’s bizarre “evidence” which was used as “proof” of this slur on the white staff was that “ethnic minority employees had to work harder than white colleagues and for less reward.”
This tactic of always blaming white people for everything when the true causes clearly lie elsewhere runs like a golden thread through the entire multicultural establishment’s reasoning.
If black people are stopped and searched more often than any other group by the police, it is not because they commit more crime, but because the “the police are racist.”
If ethnics are jailed more often than whites, it is not because they commit more crime, but it is because the “judicial system is racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in schools or universities, it is because “educational institutions are racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in jobs, it is because “employers are racist.” The list is endless.
And now, because ethnics do not want to spy on their own communities, it is because the “white staff at GCHQ are racist.”
This nonsense has to stop before it utterly destroys Britain. Only the British National Party dares to stand up and opposed this politically correct anti-white Marxist claptrap.
Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag
Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag
British taxpayers, already facing huge tax hikes to fund the Lib-Lab-Con’s disastrous economic and social policies, have been saddled with £150 million in fines for the failure to fly the EU flag in our country.
The shocking news emerged last week when the European Commission’s bureaucrats issued the fines in terms of little known regulations which say that the EU flag must be flown at all projects partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
In addition to the failure to fly the EU flag on these “EU-funded” projects, several British-based operations were also fined for failing to use the EU flag on their letterheads.
The projects named included the Eden Project in Cornwall, the Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, and the redevelopment of Liverpool’s King’s Dock.
The ridiculousness of the situation is accentuated by the fact that this “funding” is, in fact, UK tax money in the first place.
Britain is only paid back seven out of every ten pounds paid into the European superstate.
If that was not bad enough, all ERDF funding has to be matched pound for pound by Government cash. In essence then, the ERDF merely gobbles up British tax money, keeps a huge chunk for itself and gives a pittance back, which then has to be matched by the British taxpayer once again.
It would obviously be far cheaper to fund all of these projects directly from the Treasury, a simple fact which escapes the dunces in the Lib-Lab-Con party.
This year alone, Britain will contribute £6.4 billion more to Brussels than it receives back.
According to the ERDF website, Britain has received a total of £5 billion of ERDF funding since 2000, which puts this year’s payments into perspective.
According to the Bruges Group, the cost of Britain’s membership of the EU is as follows:
- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.
- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net, by 2013 this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.
- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.
- Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.
- That is the equivalent for every man, woman and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.
British taxpayers, already facing huge tax hikes to fund the Lib-Lab-Con’s disastrous economic and social policies, have been saddled with £150 million in fines for the failure to fly the EU flag in our country.
The shocking news emerged last week when the European Commission’s bureaucrats issued the fines in terms of little known regulations which say that the EU flag must be flown at all projects partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
In addition to the failure to fly the EU flag on these “EU-funded” projects, several British-based operations were also fined for failing to use the EU flag on their letterheads.
The projects named included the Eden Project in Cornwall, the Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, and the redevelopment of Liverpool’s King’s Dock.
The ridiculousness of the situation is accentuated by the fact that this “funding” is, in fact, UK tax money in the first place.
Britain is only paid back seven out of every ten pounds paid into the European superstate.
If that was not bad enough, all ERDF funding has to be matched pound for pound by Government cash. In essence then, the ERDF merely gobbles up British tax money, keeps a huge chunk for itself and gives a pittance back, which then has to be matched by the British taxpayer once again.
It would obviously be far cheaper to fund all of these projects directly from the Treasury, a simple fact which escapes the dunces in the Lib-Lab-Con party.
This year alone, Britain will contribute £6.4 billion more to Brussels than it receives back.
According to the ERDF website, Britain has received a total of £5 billion of ERDF funding since 2000, which puts this year’s payments into perspective.
According to the Bruges Group, the cost of Britain’s membership of the EU is as follows:
- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.
- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net, by 2013 this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.
- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.
- Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.
- That is the equivalent for every man, woman and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.
Saturday, 10 July 2010
Cover-up of Ethnic Cleansing Most Likely Reason for Abolition of National Census
An attempt to suppress statistics which reveal the steady ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Britain is the most likely reason for the ConDem regime’s shock announcement that the national census is to be abandoned.
The Domesday Book, 1066Although Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has cited expense as the reason to abolish the decennial census, this undertaking “only” costs £482 million to complete.
This is minor when it is considered that MPs in Westminster claim an average of £92 million per year in expenses alone and indicates that there is an alternative “real” reason for the move to abolish the census.
A news report quoted constitutional barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC as saying that “future historians will be less able to interpret Britain as a result of this decision — maybe that is the reason for it.”
Mr Robertson has hit the nail on the head. The census figures are definitive proof of the steady replacement of the indigenous population of Britain by a tsunami of Third World immigrants, encouraged and abetted by the Con-Lib-Lab party.
Mr Maude said that the census will be replaced by “regular checks on numbers using existing databases such as post office records and the electoral roll.”
Using these figures will effectively hide the changing racial demographics, as was recently well illustrated in the Barking constituency in London.
In that region, thousands of Africans were added to the voters’ roll, which in turn generated the illusion that “British” people had endorsed the Labour Party in overwhelming numbers in that area.
In reality, as all people on the ground there know, the vast majority of the remaining indigenous population support the British National Party, and the huge numbers of Third World immigrants support Labour.
To base census figures on voters' rolls will deny historians, statisticians and political scientists the ability to measure demographic change through immigration.
Given these factors, the reason behind the move to abolish the census becomes clear: it is a move by the ConDem regime to cover up its complicity in the extinction of the British people in their homeland.
* The 2011 census will still go ahead, according to reports. A national census of Britain goes back over 1,000 years to the time of the Domesday Book of 1066. The decennial census was first introduced 200 years ago during the Victorian era.
The Domesday Book, 1066Although Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has cited expense as the reason to abolish the decennial census, this undertaking “only” costs £482 million to complete.
This is minor when it is considered that MPs in Westminster claim an average of £92 million per year in expenses alone and indicates that there is an alternative “real” reason for the move to abolish the census.
A news report quoted constitutional barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC as saying that “future historians will be less able to interpret Britain as a result of this decision — maybe that is the reason for it.”
Mr Robertson has hit the nail on the head. The census figures are definitive proof of the steady replacement of the indigenous population of Britain by a tsunami of Third World immigrants, encouraged and abetted by the Con-Lib-Lab party.
Mr Maude said that the census will be replaced by “regular checks on numbers using existing databases such as post office records and the electoral roll.”
Using these figures will effectively hide the changing racial demographics, as was recently well illustrated in the Barking constituency in London.
In that region, thousands of Africans were added to the voters’ roll, which in turn generated the illusion that “British” people had endorsed the Labour Party in overwhelming numbers in that area.
In reality, as all people on the ground there know, the vast majority of the remaining indigenous population support the British National Party, and the huge numbers of Third World immigrants support Labour.
To base census figures on voters' rolls will deny historians, statisticians and political scientists the ability to measure demographic change through immigration.
Given these factors, the reason behind the move to abolish the census becomes clear: it is a move by the ConDem regime to cover up its complicity in the extinction of the British people in their homeland.
* The 2011 census will still go ahead, according to reports. A national census of Britain goes back over 1,000 years to the time of the Domesday Book of 1066. The decennial census was first introduced 200 years ago during the Victorian era.
Thursday, 8 July 2010
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
How British People Are Put Last on the Social Housing Queue
British people are always put last on social housing queues behind immigrants because they are invariable already classed as “accommodated” as they live with other family members, a whistleblower has told the Daily Mail.
In a shocking inside story, the Daily Mail today published a long interview with a whistleblower working inside a social house agency in London.
The whistleblower, codenamed “Chris,” lifted the lid on how immigrants are ruthlessly exploiting the social housing system.
According to the interview, the social housing system is “designed to help the destitute” but is being abused by “undeserving chancers and cheats.”
The interview then goes on to describe in detail one of the many cases with which Chris had to deal, including that of a recently arrived Somali family who did not want a three story £1 million mansion in central London because it did not come with an automatic right-to-buy discount.
“I thought that question was a bit odd, considering the family supposedly didn't have a penny to their name, which was why they were throwing themselves on the mercy of the good old British taxpayer.
“Where would they get the funds to buy a townhouse in central London? This 'penniless' family also wanted to know whether they got a residents' parking space with the property.
“I had to tell them 'No' to that as well. They shrugged and spread their arms, as if to say: 'How on earth do you expect us to live here? Why are you wasting our time dragging us here?' And off they went,” Chris told the newspaper.
The whistleblower also revealed out the system “rewards those family members who have just stepped off a plane by giving them a wonderful property in a central location, while Britons who have been here for years or even generations have got no chance of getting to the top of the list.”
Chris explained that this is because “British applicants tend to be already living with family — parents, etc. — so technically qualify as being housed. Recent arrivals with kids in tow do not and are given priority.”
He also revealed that a big problem amongst Turkish abusers of the system is that they want properties where they can erect large satellite dishes to watch Turkish TV.
“How are they paying for it? Tenants who are supposedly on the breadline often have luxury goods like plasma TVs,” Chris said.
“Properties with open-plan kitchens can be a problem too, as Somalian or other Muslim 'customers' often don't want a kitchen that opens straight on to a reception room, and these type of houses are always turned down.
“I was given the reason by one man: If he wanted to invite other men around to play cards or whatever, he didn't want them to see his wife making food in the kitchen.
The full shocking interview, which contains many more examples of how Third World immigrants are ripping off the system, can be found here.
In a shocking inside story, the Daily Mail today published a long interview with a whistleblower working inside a social house agency in London.
The whistleblower, codenamed “Chris,” lifted the lid on how immigrants are ruthlessly exploiting the social housing system.
According to the interview, the social housing system is “designed to help the destitute” but is being abused by “undeserving chancers and cheats.”
The interview then goes on to describe in detail one of the many cases with which Chris had to deal, including that of a recently arrived Somali family who did not want a three story £1 million mansion in central London because it did not come with an automatic right-to-buy discount.
“I thought that question was a bit odd, considering the family supposedly didn't have a penny to their name, which was why they were throwing themselves on the mercy of the good old British taxpayer.
“Where would they get the funds to buy a townhouse in central London? This 'penniless' family also wanted to know whether they got a residents' parking space with the property.
“I had to tell them 'No' to that as well. They shrugged and spread their arms, as if to say: 'How on earth do you expect us to live here? Why are you wasting our time dragging us here?' And off they went,” Chris told the newspaper.
The whistleblower also revealed out the system “rewards those family members who have just stepped off a plane by giving them a wonderful property in a central location, while Britons who have been here for years or even generations have got no chance of getting to the top of the list.”
Chris explained that this is because “British applicants tend to be already living with family — parents, etc. — so technically qualify as being housed. Recent arrivals with kids in tow do not and are given priority.”
He also revealed that a big problem amongst Turkish abusers of the system is that they want properties where they can erect large satellite dishes to watch Turkish TV.
“How are they paying for it? Tenants who are supposedly on the breadline often have luxury goods like plasma TVs,” Chris said.
“Properties with open-plan kitchens can be a problem too, as Somalian or other Muslim 'customers' often don't want a kitchen that opens straight on to a reception room, and these type of houses are always turned down.
“I was given the reason by one man: If he wanted to invite other men around to play cards or whatever, he didn't want them to see his wife making food in the kitchen.
The full shocking interview, which contains many more examples of how Third World immigrants are ripping off the system, can be found here.
Police Investigate BNP Man’s Complaints Against UAF’s George Galloway
Police have confirmed that they are “compiling evidence” after West Wales British National Party deputy organiser Mike Green lodged a formal complaint against the UAF’s George Galloway following an inflammatory speech made in London last month.
Mr Green laid the complaint with the police after viewing YouTube video copies of the speech by Mr Galloway given at a UAF rally in east London in which an overt threat of violence was made.
During the speech, Mr Galloway warned that anybody who “dare[d] touch a hijab [hair cover] on a Muslim woman’s head, if you dare touch the hair on the beard of a Muslim man in Tower Hamlets, you will have to fight your way through 10,000 dead bodies first.”
Mr Green’s complaint with the Metropolitan Police was backed up by at least a dozen similar complaints organised through a Facebook campaign.
The police have video footage of the former Glasgow MP, who is a founding member of the Respect Party, telling the rally: “To the EDL, take a look around you boys. Take a look around you.
Footage of Mr Galloway’s speech has appeared online at YouTube under the heading: “Why half a million Brits vote BNP. George Galloway incites race violence.”
UAF posters in the Muslim crowd.The London rally at which the speech was made was organised by anti-BNP organisation “Unite Against Fascism” and their trademark purple anti-BNP posters were widespread amongst the 3,000 strong Muslim crowd in attendance.
UAF secretary general Weyman Bennett was arrested in March this year by police and charged with suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.
Despite Mr Bennett being an active executive member of the extremist far left Socialist Workers Party, David Cameron is a founding signatory member of the UAF.
Mr Cameron is joined by MPs and MEPs from both Lib Dems and Labour in his allegiance to the UAF organisation which, as Mr Galloway’s speech has confirmed, is little more than a front to assist the Islamic colonisation of Britain.
Mr Green laid the complaint with the police after viewing YouTube video copies of the speech by Mr Galloway given at a UAF rally in east London in which an overt threat of violence was made.
During the speech, Mr Galloway warned that anybody who “dare[d] touch a hijab [hair cover] on a Muslim woman’s head, if you dare touch the hair on the beard of a Muslim man in Tower Hamlets, you will have to fight your way through 10,000 dead bodies first.”
Mr Green’s complaint with the Metropolitan Police was backed up by at least a dozen similar complaints organised through a Facebook campaign.
The police have video footage of the former Glasgow MP, who is a founding member of the Respect Party, telling the rally: “To the EDL, take a look around you boys. Take a look around you.
Footage of Mr Galloway’s speech has appeared online at YouTube under the heading: “Why half a million Brits vote BNP. George Galloway incites race violence.”
UAF posters in the Muslim crowd.The London rally at which the speech was made was organised by anti-BNP organisation “Unite Against Fascism” and their trademark purple anti-BNP posters were widespread amongst the 3,000 strong Muslim crowd in attendance.
UAF secretary general Weyman Bennett was arrested in March this year by police and charged with suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.
Despite Mr Bennett being an active executive member of the extremist far left Socialist Workers Party, David Cameron is a founding signatory member of the UAF.
Mr Cameron is joined by MPs and MEPs from both Lib Dems and Labour in his allegiance to the UAF organisation which, as Mr Galloway’s speech has confirmed, is little more than a front to assist the Islamic colonisation of Britain.
We have not learnt the lesson of the July 7 suicide bombing
In the five years since suicide bombers killed 52 people in London, placatory government policy on Islamist terrorism has achieved little but store up trouble for the future.
Today marks the fifth anniversary of the day suicide bombing came to Britain. On July 7, 2005 three young British-born men exploded their devices simultaneously on the London Underground. A fourth man detonated his an hour later on a bus in Tavistock Square. Together they left 52 people dead, many more injured.
Muslim hate preacher and the former head of banned group Al-Muhajiroun, Anjem Choudary has warned that Britain faces more home-grown terror attacks like 7/7."The British public had failed to learn the lessons of the 2005 atrocity that killed 52 innocent people," Choudary, was quoted as saying.Today is the fifth anniversary of the suicide attacks that killed 52 people and hurt hundreds more."The public has not made progress to avoid another calamity befalling them. Rather, more fuel is being poured on to the fire. Unless the British withdraw all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, no doubt we can expect more of the same," he added.
Choudary, whose Islamic group Islam4UK was banned after public outcry at his plans to protest at Wootton Bassett, said the key to avoiding attacks was in the hands of the Government.
Today marks the fifth anniversary of the day suicide bombing came to Britain. On July 7, 2005 three young British-born men exploded their devices simultaneously on the London Underground. A fourth man detonated his an hour later on a bus in Tavistock Square. Together they left 52 people dead, many more injured.
Muslim hate preacher and the former head of banned group Al-Muhajiroun, Anjem Choudary has warned that Britain faces more home-grown terror attacks like 7/7."The British public had failed to learn the lessons of the 2005 atrocity that killed 52 innocent people," Choudary, was quoted as saying.Today is the fifth anniversary of the suicide attacks that killed 52 people and hurt hundreds more."The public has not made progress to avoid another calamity befalling them. Rather, more fuel is being poured on to the fire. Unless the British withdraw all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, no doubt we can expect more of the same," he added.
Choudary, whose Islamic group Islam4UK was banned after public outcry at his plans to protest at Wootton Bassett, said the key to avoiding attacks was in the hands of the Government.
A school forced to buy computer translator because half of its pupils can't speak English
A primary school where more than half of pupils are non-English speaking has become the first in Britain to give every child a computerised translator.
Around 60 per cent of the 384 pupils at Manor Park Primary School in Aston, Birmingham, now communicate with teachers using the software.
Pupils type in questions into the computer using their native language which is then translated verbally into English for the teacher.Read more.
In reverse, teachers' words can be translated back into 25 different languages.
The primary school is the first in Britain to give the 'Talking Tutor' computer software to every pupil.
English-speaking students also use the translator in order to communicate with their foreign classmates. Headteacher Jason Smith said the technology was 'invaluable'.
He said: 'This is a tool. It is not a replacement. It is the sort of tool that we can use to engage with children who have recently arrived in the country and have very little spoken English.
'It can vary, but at any one time we have 30 plus languages being spoken at the school, so this is invaluable to us.
'Last week we enrolled a pupils from Gambia who could only speak a tribal language, so we checked online to see if we had something that closely matched it.
'We found the closest match and both the child and their parent could understand us.'
The school pays £700 per annum for the software which comes with on-screen avatars based on the ethnic background of the pupils. The avatars includes an Asian man, a white Eastern European and a black African man.
Plans are also in the pipeline to include a Chinese woman avatar and there are even proposals to develop a Burka-wearing Muslim.
The software, developed by Lincoln-based firm EMAS Uk cost more than £2.5 million to produce.
It verbally translates English into 25 languages including Polish, Urdu, Pakistani and Chinese. A further 200 languages can be translated on-screen for pupils to read.
Chris Pickles, director of EMAS UK, said: 'The technology enables non-English speaking pupils to feel more understood and to understand more.
'Manor Park Primary School is a centre of excellence for using this tool and is the first in Britain to have Talking Tutor in every class.'
To avoid embarrassing misunderstandings, the computer programme comes with a contexual engine which translates the meaning of the message rather than a word-for-word translation.
The school started using the translator - which is 95 per cent accurate - in every classroom two weeks ago.
Mr Smith said: 'Just because English isn't a pupil's first language, it doesn't mean that they aren't academically gifted, so this allows us to assess them in their own language while helping them with their English at the same time.'
The latest figures from the Department for Education show 905,610 children in the UK do not speak English as their first language - a rise of 42,750 since last year.
In Tower Hamlets, east London, 78 per cent of children are non-English speakers - the highest area in the UK.
Around 60 per cent of the 384 pupils at Manor Park Primary School in Aston, Birmingham, now communicate with teachers using the software.
Pupils type in questions into the computer using their native language which is then translated verbally into English for the teacher.Read more.
In reverse, teachers' words can be translated back into 25 different languages.
The primary school is the first in Britain to give the 'Talking Tutor' computer software to every pupil.
English-speaking students also use the translator in order to communicate with their foreign classmates. Headteacher Jason Smith said the technology was 'invaluable'.
He said: 'This is a tool. It is not a replacement. It is the sort of tool that we can use to engage with children who have recently arrived in the country and have very little spoken English.
'It can vary, but at any one time we have 30 plus languages being spoken at the school, so this is invaluable to us.
'Last week we enrolled a pupils from Gambia who could only speak a tribal language, so we checked online to see if we had something that closely matched it.
'We found the closest match and both the child and their parent could understand us.'
The school pays £700 per annum for the software which comes with on-screen avatars based on the ethnic background of the pupils. The avatars includes an Asian man, a white Eastern European and a black African man.
Plans are also in the pipeline to include a Chinese woman avatar and there are even proposals to develop a Burka-wearing Muslim.
The software, developed by Lincoln-based firm EMAS Uk cost more than £2.5 million to produce.
It verbally translates English into 25 languages including Polish, Urdu, Pakistani and Chinese. A further 200 languages can be translated on-screen for pupils to read.
Chris Pickles, director of EMAS UK, said: 'The technology enables non-English speaking pupils to feel more understood and to understand more.
'Manor Park Primary School is a centre of excellence for using this tool and is the first in Britain to have Talking Tutor in every class.'
To avoid embarrassing misunderstandings, the computer programme comes with a contexual engine which translates the meaning of the message rather than a word-for-word translation.
The school started using the translator - which is 95 per cent accurate - in every classroom two weeks ago.
Mr Smith said: 'Just because English isn't a pupil's first language, it doesn't mean that they aren't academically gifted, so this allows us to assess them in their own language while helping them with their English at the same time.'
The latest figures from the Department for Education show 905,610 children in the UK do not speak English as their first language - a rise of 42,750 since last year.
In Tower Hamlets, east London, 78 per cent of children are non-English speakers - the highest area in the UK.
Tuesday, 6 July 2010
Friday, 2 July 2010
Wednesday, 30 June 2010
Thursday, 24 June 2010
Monday, 21 June 2010
Wednesday, 16 June 2010
MUSLIM EXTREMISTS SPIT AT BRITISH TROOPS' HOMECOMING
HERO British troops were yesterday spat at by Muslim extremists during a homecoming parade.
More than 100 supporters of Muslims Against Crusades left onlookers sickened as they hurled abuse at the 1st Battalion the Royal Anglian Regiment, known as The Vikings.
The soldiers, who lost five men in Afghanistan on a six-month tour, were confronted by the bearded hate mob in Barking, Essex.
But the protesters were soon cowering behind police after furious onlookers and members of the controversial English Defence League surged toward them with chants of “scum” and “traitors”.
Drinkers at a local pub hurled frozen pork sausages at them. Charlene Byrne, 24, whose partner Lance Corporal Scott Hardy, 26, was killed in an explosion, said: “It makes me so angry.”
A friend added: “The only reason these cowards are even allowed to stand here and hurl abuse is because we have brave men and women fighting abroad to protect those freedoms.”
Barking and Dagenham Council leader Liam Smith had asked Home Secretary Theresa May to ban MAC.
Meanwhile, two British soldiers were killed yesterday in shooting incidents in Afghanistan.
The soldiers, who lost five men in Afghanistan on a six-month tour, were confronted by the bearded hate mob in Barking, Essex.
But the protesters were soon cowering behind police after furious onlookers and members of the controversial English Defence League surged toward them with chants of “scum” and “traitors”.
Drinkers at a local pub hurled frozen pork sausages at them. Charlene Byrne, 24, whose partner Lance Corporal Scott Hardy, 26, was killed in an explosion, said: “It makes me so angry.”
A friend added: “The only reason these cowards are even allowed to stand here and hurl abuse is because we have brave men and women fighting abroad to protect those freedoms.”
Barking and Dagenham Council leader Liam Smith had asked Home Secretary Theresa May to ban MAC.
Meanwhile, two British soldiers were killed yesterday in shooting incidents in Afghanistan.
Tuesday, 15 June 2010
Muslim protesters brand war heroes 'murderers' as homecoming parade turns violent
A group of extremist Muslims prompted violent clashes at a homecoming parade for British troops today after they heckled soldiers and called them 'murderers.'
Members of the Muslim Against the Crusade group clashed with far right protesters as they shouted 'murderers, murderers, murderers' and 'British troops go to hell' as members of the 1st Battalion the Royal Anglian Regiment paraded down the streets of Barking, Essex.
The chants were drowned out by a large mob on the opposite side of the street who retaliated with jeers of 'Traitors' to the Muslim protesters
Members of the Muslim Against the Crusade group clashed with far right protesters as they shouted 'murderers, murderers, murderers' and 'British troops go to hell' as members of the 1st Battalion the Royal Anglian Regiment paraded down the streets of Barking, Essex.
The chants were drowned out by a large mob on the opposite side of the street who retaliated with jeers of 'Traitors' to the Muslim protesters
The hour-long parade had been delayed due to growing tensions between the two sides, with anti-Mac protestors singing God Save the Queen and drinkers at a nearby pub hurling frozen pork sausages at the Muslims.
Moments after the soldiers passed through tensions reached boiling point and the anti-Mac campaigners broke through the barricades, charged across the road and traded punches with the Muslim throng.
Police quickly separated the mob, with one man wrestled to the ground, handcuffed and led away while the police made a ring surrounding the Muslim group.
They then had to hold back the anti-Muslim group as the Mac protesters made their way to a tube station.
Two men were arrested after the violence, for public order offences.
Local woman Dee McEvoy, 50, stood in front of the Muslims protesters, waving her two union Jack flags as the soldiers passed.
She said: 'I'm here for the army and the British forces. The protesters are entitled to their opinion but they are taking it out on the wrong people. They should be taking it out on the Government.
'This is not the reception these boys and girls deserve. But it is democracy in action.' Earlier the Muslim group was attacked by a barrage of eggs.
Moments after the soldiers passed through tensions reached boiling point and the anti-Mac campaigners broke through the barricades, charged across the road and traded punches with the Muslim throng.
Police quickly separated the mob, with one man wrestled to the ground, handcuffed and led away while the police made a ring surrounding the Muslim group.
They then had to hold back the anti-Muslim group as the Mac protesters made their way to a tube station.
Two men were arrested after the violence, for public order offences.
Local woman Dee McEvoy, 50, stood in front of the Muslims protesters, waving her two union Jack flags as the soldiers passed.
She said: 'I'm here for the army and the British forces. The protesters are entitled to their opinion but they are taking it out on the wrong people. They should be taking it out on the Government.
'This is not the reception these boys and girls deserve. But it is democracy in action.' Earlier the Muslim group was attacked by a barrage of eggs.
One member of the Mac group used a megaphone to shout: 'This is a protest against parading in a Muslim area. We love death the way you love life.'
He branded British soldiers as 'butchers' and 'despots'.
The Muslim protesters chanted 'Democracy' as they had an uneasy stand-off against a mob, some waving St George's Crosses, Union flags and an English Defence League flag.
Anti-Mac protesters sang 'I'll be English 'till my dying day,' and jeered 'We pay your benefits'.
Further down the street onlookers, who had arrived simply to pay their respects to the soldiers, were disgusted by the scenes.
The girlfriend of a Royal Anglian soldier killed in Afghanistan said the extremists should have been banned from attending the parade.
Lance Corporal Scott Hardy, 26, from Chelmsford in Essex, was killed in an explosion near Musa Qala on Tuesday March 16, just weeks before he was due to return home.
He branded British soldiers as 'butchers' and 'despots'.
The Muslim protesters chanted 'Democracy' as they had an uneasy stand-off against a mob, some waving St George's Crosses, Union flags and an English Defence League flag.
Anti-Mac protesters sang 'I'll be English 'till my dying day,' and jeered 'We pay your benefits'.
Further down the street onlookers, who had arrived simply to pay their respects to the soldiers, were disgusted by the scenes.
The girlfriend of a Royal Anglian soldier killed in Afghanistan said the extremists should have been banned from attending the parade.
Lance Corporal Scott Hardy, 26, from Chelmsford in Essex, was killed in an explosion near Musa Qala on Tuesday March 16, just weeks before he was due to return home.
Lance Corporal Hardy's partner Charlene Byrne, 24, said: 'It's absolutely disgusting. I know this kind of thing has happened before in Luton but I don't understand how it has been allowed to happened again.
'It's terrible that this group has got away with it. Obviously not everyone supports what's happening in Afghanistan, there are people who are very angry about it, but they shouldn't take it out on the soldiers.'
Emily Penson-Clark, who took the day off work to support the soldiers with her young daughter and parents said: 'I think the protesters are filth. I'm here to support our troops. They put their lives on the line for us. I've got three words: Help for Heroes.'
The soldiers remained undaunted by the abuse, and marched through the town centre with fixed bayonets, accompanied by the Minden Band, a Colour Party and two guards of 70 officers and non-commisioned officers.
The Freedom parade stopped briefly in Barking Town Square where the Mayor, Councillor Nirmal Singh Gill, General Sir John McColl and the Queen's deputy Lieutenant Major Anthony O'Hagan took a salute and inspected the troops.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1286784/Muslim-protesters-brand-war-heroes-murderers-homecoming-parade-turns-violent.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#ixzz0r22Bi6J9
'It's terrible that this group has got away with it. Obviously not everyone supports what's happening in Afghanistan, there are people who are very angry about it, but they shouldn't take it out on the soldiers.'
Emily Penson-Clark, who took the day off work to support the soldiers with her young daughter and parents said: 'I think the protesters are filth. I'm here to support our troops. They put their lives on the line for us. I've got three words: Help for Heroes.'
The soldiers remained undaunted by the abuse, and marched through the town centre with fixed bayonets, accompanied by the Minden Band, a Colour Party and two guards of 70 officers and non-commisioned officers.
The Freedom parade stopped briefly in Barking Town Square where the Mayor, Councillor Nirmal Singh Gill, General Sir John McColl and the Queen's deputy Lieutenant Major Anthony O'Hagan took a salute and inspected the troops.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1286784/Muslim-protesters-brand-war-heroes-murderers-homecoming-parade-turns-violent.html?ito=feeds-newsxml#ixzz0r22Bi6J9
The “Mongrel Race” Nonsense Refuted
Possibly one of the best examples is Cheddar Gorge Man who is an example of how people have stayed where they were for thousands of years.
The remains of Cheddar Man were excavated in 1903 and have been dated at around 7,150 BC.
In 1996, his DNA was profiled and a sample from 20 residents of a nearby village was taken. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett.
What this means is incredible — these people are direct descendants of Cheddar Man and still live in the same area, nearly 10,000 years later.
The historical and genetic evidence support the fact that there is indeed a native people of Britain who have a right to this land. We have as much right as the American Indians, Aborigines or Maoris.
There were invasions and a small amount of migration but, as has been already stated, these were from people just across the channel.
So why do they wish to convince us that we are all mixed race?
The agenda of previous Labour and Conservative governments have only ever been concerned about re-election at any cost.
They know that importing cheap workers will provide short-term prosperity and thus they will secure re-election.
By offering free handouts to immigrants they know that when the time comes they can count on the ethnic vote.
The proof is here. They have betrayed their own people.
The erasure of the native British people today has already begun and it is legitimised by whitewashing over our truthful British history with lies. Don’t stand for it.It is outrageous and deeply offensive that politicians, the media and left-wing celebrities have promoted the lie that we are somehow all basically from mixed breeding stock in order to legitimise the invasion by hordes of foreigners.
Eddie Izzard said in his TV series Mongrel Britain, “our country has been massively diverse for most of its history — a blend of Angles, Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Celts.”
But the history of the British people shows that we have been here for thousands of years and that past invasions have contributed no more than five percent to our population.
Izzard speaks with excitement about “rich diversity” and “a dynamic and vibrant mix of foreign genes.”
Yet there is nothing vibrant or dynamic about losing your job to cheap Eastern European workers or finding that you can’t spot a white face in your high street.
The diversity he speaks of isn’t rich. The UK is poorer as a result of free handouts for immigrants and gifts to third world countries.
Our cultural heritage has been savaged as we are forced to accept barbaric religions and the criminal scamming culture that we always knew was present in poor countries.
How dare they smile condescendingly while they attempt to change history and teach us that we owe everything, as Izzard claims, to “waves of invasion, centuries of immigration and floods of foreign ideas.”
The numbers of invaders were in fact few — mostly only in the tens of thousands and, crucially, all of the invaders' origins were limited to northern Europe. Two weeks before the election this year, Sandy Walkington, a Liberal Democrat candidate for St Albans said, "We're all mongrels. I mean, this country is the most mongrel country in the world. In 200 years we'll all be coffee-coloured — and I've got no problem with that.”
This is supported fully by up-to-date genetic evidence in the book Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Great Britain by Arthur Kemp. (Available here).
Kemp presents genetic evidence proving that the vast majority of British people have ancestors going back 12,000 years when haplogroups R1b, I and R1a spread northwards. British people with the R1b1 DNA haplotypes have on average a 74 percent homogeneity, with the remainder coming from countries just across the sea.
Historical records offer proof as well:
The Romans invaded in AD 43 with an army of 40–45,000 men but only 16,000 legionaries were stationed here afterwards.
Estimates for the population at that time are around 1.5 million; therefore, the effect of this invasion was one to two percent (Eagles Over Britannia: The Roman Army in Britain by Guy de la Bedoyere).
“In the sixth century the Anglo-Saxon element in the population of Britain amounted to no more than fifty to a hundred thousand” (Arthur's Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367–634 by Leslie Alcock).
Therefore, the Anglo-Saxon contribution would be somewhere between three and six percent.
DNA evidence shows that the R1a Haplogroup for Anglo-Saxons in England is 4.5 percent, a remarkable correlation (Kemp, ibid).
Between 789–1104 AD, the Vikings were known for their ferocious attacks on villages but only small numbers actually settled. War bands were tiny: “from seven to thirty-five a band and above three dozen an army” (Anglo-Saxon England by Lloyd and Jennifer Laing).
After the Norman Conquest, William, Duke of Normandy, dismissed his mercenaries and nearly all returned to France.
“The probability is that the Continental settlement did not involve more than 10,000 people — and perhaps as few as 5,000” (Offshore Islanders: From Roman Occupation to European Entry by Paul Johnson). “England simply acquired a new ruling class,” writes Johnson.
The Flemish and Walloons came from what is now Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and parts of northern France and Germany. About 16,000 were recorded in 1440, which was less than one percent.
The population at the time was estimated between two and 2.5 million, and had diminished as a result of the Black Death (Roots of the Future: An Education Pack for Exploring Ethnic Diversity in Britain by Peter White).
The Jews also settled at various periods in history but did not approve of marriage to Gentiles. In 1290, the community of around 5,000 was expelled by Edward I.
They returned slowly and by 1815, there were around 20–30,000. Around 55,000 Jews arrived between 1933 and 1939. Britain’s population was at 40 million in 1940, and therefore the Jewish contribution was at best 0.3 percent.
Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a small trickle of people from all over Europe. In England and Wales, the 1871 census recorded 32,823 Germans, an Italian population of 5,063, again not significant amounts compared to the population of 20 million.
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) estimates 50,000 Huguenot and 80,000 French Protestants arrived between 1680 and 1720. About 40,000 of these left for America.
However, around 1685, the population of Britain was four to 4.5 million, meaning that the contribution was still only about two percent (White, ibid; and Alien Immigrants to England by W Cunningham).
Between 1600 and 1800, people didn’t welcome foreigners with open arms and intermarriage of any sort was infrequent. Even when William of Orange came to England to unseat the unpopular James II, he was accompanied only by approximately 11,000 foot and 4,000 horse soldiers. The effect of his invasion was once again small.
The marriages between kings and queens of Europe and their relative squabbles did not have much of a bearing on the poor, often starving, ordinary people who mostly stayed where they were for thousands of years.
Written by Alan Robertson , source www.bnp.org.uk
The remains of Cheddar Man were excavated in 1903 and have been dated at around 7,150 BC.
In 1996, his DNA was profiled and a sample from 20 residents of a nearby village was taken. It produced two exact matches and one match with a single mutation. The close match was a history teacher named Adrian Targett.
What this means is incredible — these people are direct descendants of Cheddar Man and still live in the same area, nearly 10,000 years later.
The historical and genetic evidence support the fact that there is indeed a native people of Britain who have a right to this land. We have as much right as the American Indians, Aborigines or Maoris.
There were invasions and a small amount of migration but, as has been already stated, these were from people just across the channel.
So why do they wish to convince us that we are all mixed race?
The agenda of previous Labour and Conservative governments have only ever been concerned about re-election at any cost.
They know that importing cheap workers will provide short-term prosperity and thus they will secure re-election.
By offering free handouts to immigrants they know that when the time comes they can count on the ethnic vote.
The proof is here. They have betrayed their own people.
The erasure of the native British people today has already begun and it is legitimised by whitewashing over our truthful British history with lies. Don’t stand for it.It is outrageous and deeply offensive that politicians, the media and left-wing celebrities have promoted the lie that we are somehow all basically from mixed breeding stock in order to legitimise the invasion by hordes of foreigners.
Eddie Izzard said in his TV series Mongrel Britain, “our country has been massively diverse for most of its history — a blend of Angles, Saxons, Romans, Vikings, Celts.”
But the history of the British people shows that we have been here for thousands of years and that past invasions have contributed no more than five percent to our population.
Izzard speaks with excitement about “rich diversity” and “a dynamic and vibrant mix of foreign genes.”
Yet there is nothing vibrant or dynamic about losing your job to cheap Eastern European workers or finding that you can’t spot a white face in your high street.
The diversity he speaks of isn’t rich. The UK is poorer as a result of free handouts for immigrants and gifts to third world countries.
Our cultural heritage has been savaged as we are forced to accept barbaric religions and the criminal scamming culture that we always knew was present in poor countries.
How dare they smile condescendingly while they attempt to change history and teach us that we owe everything, as Izzard claims, to “waves of invasion, centuries of immigration and floods of foreign ideas.”
The numbers of invaders were in fact few — mostly only in the tens of thousands and, crucially, all of the invaders' origins were limited to northern Europe. Two weeks before the election this year, Sandy Walkington, a Liberal Democrat candidate for St Albans said, "We're all mongrels. I mean, this country is the most mongrel country in the world. In 200 years we'll all be coffee-coloured — and I've got no problem with that.”
This is supported fully by up-to-date genetic evidence in the book Four Flags: The Indigenous People of Great Britain by Arthur Kemp. (Available here).
Kemp presents genetic evidence proving that the vast majority of British people have ancestors going back 12,000 years when haplogroups R1b, I and R1a spread northwards. British people with the R1b1 DNA haplotypes have on average a 74 percent homogeneity, with the remainder coming from countries just across the sea.
Historical records offer proof as well:
The Romans invaded in AD 43 with an army of 40–45,000 men but only 16,000 legionaries were stationed here afterwards.
Estimates for the population at that time are around 1.5 million; therefore, the effect of this invasion was one to two percent (Eagles Over Britannia: The Roman Army in Britain by Guy de la Bedoyere).
“In the sixth century the Anglo-Saxon element in the population of Britain amounted to no more than fifty to a hundred thousand” (Arthur's Britain: History and Archaeology AD 367–634 by Leslie Alcock).
Therefore, the Anglo-Saxon contribution would be somewhere between three and six percent.
DNA evidence shows that the R1a Haplogroup for Anglo-Saxons in England is 4.5 percent, a remarkable correlation (Kemp, ibid).
Between 789–1104 AD, the Vikings were known for their ferocious attacks on villages but only small numbers actually settled. War bands were tiny: “from seven to thirty-five a band and above three dozen an army” (Anglo-Saxon England by Lloyd and Jennifer Laing).
After the Norman Conquest, William, Duke of Normandy, dismissed his mercenaries and nearly all returned to France.
“The probability is that the Continental settlement did not involve more than 10,000 people — and perhaps as few as 5,000” (Offshore Islanders: From Roman Occupation to European Entry by Paul Johnson). “England simply acquired a new ruling class,” writes Johnson.
The Flemish and Walloons came from what is now Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg and parts of northern France and Germany. About 16,000 were recorded in 1440, which was less than one percent.
The population at the time was estimated between two and 2.5 million, and had diminished as a result of the Black Death (Roots of the Future: An Education Pack for Exploring Ethnic Diversity in Britain by Peter White).
The Jews also settled at various periods in history but did not approve of marriage to Gentiles. In 1290, the community of around 5,000 was expelled by Edward I.
They returned slowly and by 1815, there were around 20–30,000. Around 55,000 Jews arrived between 1933 and 1939. Britain’s population was at 40 million in 1940, and therefore the Jewish contribution was at best 0.3 percent.
Throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a small trickle of people from all over Europe. In England and Wales, the 1871 census recorded 32,823 Germans, an Italian population of 5,063, again not significant amounts compared to the population of 20 million.
The Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) estimates 50,000 Huguenot and 80,000 French Protestants arrived between 1680 and 1720. About 40,000 of these left for America.
However, around 1685, the population of Britain was four to 4.5 million, meaning that the contribution was still only about two percent (White, ibid; and Alien Immigrants to England by W Cunningham).
Between 1600 and 1800, people didn’t welcome foreigners with open arms and intermarriage of any sort was infrequent. Even when William of Orange came to England to unseat the unpopular James II, he was accompanied only by approximately 11,000 foot and 4,000 horse soldiers. The effect of his invasion was once again small.
The marriages between kings and queens of Europe and their relative squabbles did not have much of a bearing on the poor, often starving, ordinary people who mostly stayed where they were for thousands of years.
Written by Alan Robertson , source www.bnp.org.uk
Monday, 14 June 2010
Saturday, 12 June 2010
BRITISH HATING DAVID MILIBAND VOWS TO AXE TORY LIMIT ON MIGRANTS
A LABOUR Party rift over immigration was exposed last night after leadership favourite David Miliband called for Britain’s open-door border policy to stay in place.
The former Foreign Secretary – the early front-runner in the race to succeed Gordon Brown – vowed to fight Tory plans for an annual limit on immigration and scrap the measure if he ever becomes Prime Minister.
And he was critical of former premier Mr Brown’s ill-fated “British jobs for British workers” slogan.
Mr Miliband’s remarks came at the first hustings in the leadership contest on Wednesday night.
The former Foreign Secretary – the early front-runner in the race to succeed Gordon Brown – vowed to fight Tory plans for an annual limit on immigration and scrap the measure if he ever becomes Prime Minister.
And he was critical of former premier Mr Brown’s ill-fated “British jobs for British workers” slogan.
Mr Miliband’s remarks came at the first hustings in the leadership contest on Wednesday night.
Source Express.co.uk
Muslims in Barking desecrate war memorial with rubbish from islam
Muslims Against Crusades activists have plastered Barking war memorial with their hateful rubbish, while over on their website they say:
In the midst of this severe trial that has befallen the Muslim Ummah, the British government has recently made way for a vile parade in Barking & Dagenham on 15th June 2010, to honour the death squads that have serve in Afghanistan; the very same soldiers who fired the bullets and laid the bombs that made children orphans and mothers widows in a single moments of sadistic range are now being honoured these crimes.O Muslims! Indeed the Crusades were never over; Allah (SWT) says in the Qur’an, [EMQ 2:210] “The Jews and the Christians will never be happy with you until you follow their way of life.”We call you to rise and condemn this sickening parade and let the British government know, that we as Muslim will never tolerate for a single Crusader solider to be honoured whilst we are alive, and that we will continue to struggle to make the Deen of Allah (SWT) the highest until it dominates all over the world.
Source http://derbypatriot.blogspot.com/2010/06/muslims-descrate-barking-war-memorial.html
Friday, 11 June 2010
Thursday, 10 June 2010
Wednesday, 9 June 2010
IMMIGRATION BOOM TO THROW UK’S ‘PUBLIC SERVICES INTO CHAOS’
Britain will struggle to cope with an immigration-fuelled population boom that threatens to leave public services in chaos, a report from, 'The forum for the future study' says.
A population growth of almost 10 million by 2030 and almost all from immigration, leading to housing and job shortages becoming common place.
According to the Office for National Statistics, Britain’s population will increase from 61.4 million in 2008 to 70 million by 2029.
By 2034, the population is forecast to grow by 10 million, with almost all the increase in England. Seven million will be due to immigration alone.
A population growth of almost 10 million by 2030 and almost all from immigration, leading to housing and job shortages becoming common place.
According to the Office for National Statistics, Britain’s population will increase from 61.4 million in 2008 to 70 million by 2029.
By 2034, the population is forecast to grow by 10 million, with almost all the increase in England. Seven million will be due to immigration alone.
Muslim community leader made up story claiming the BNP had kidnapped him
Muslim community leader, Noor Ramjanally, claimed he was kidnapped by members of the British National Party but was caught out lying by covert surveillance cameras designed to protect him, a court heard.
36 year old Noor Ramjanally, falsely claimed he was abducted at knifepoint by "racist thugs" from the British National Party after being subjected to hate mail and an arson attack, Chelmsford Crown Court was told.
Mr Ramjanally had told police he had feared for his life when he was kidnapped in broad daylight from his home in Loughton, Essex on August 24 last year and bundled into a car.
Ramjanally then claimed he was driven to nearby Epping Forest where he was threatened and warned to stop holding prayer sessions he had organised.
But he was caught out lying after detectives viewed CTTV footage from secret cameras installed to protect him after his previous claims that he was being targeted by racist opponents, prosecutors said.
The court heard that at the time of his alleged abduction he was actually “wandering around Homebase".
The court heard that at the time of his alleged abduction he was actually “wandering around Homebase".
Tuesday, 8 June 2010
Prisoners converting to islam for the easy life
If you were in prison, why might you decide to convert to Islam? 
A cushier life and nicer grub, according to the to the sun today.
This is according to a report published today from the chief inspector of prisons, to explain why inmates in many jails in England and Wales decide to embrace islam while behind bars.
In a claim made to BBC'5 Donal MacIntyre in march by a anonymous prison officer that,
" young inmates were been forced to convert in order to get protection from a Muslim gang rather than follow the faith" Would also sum up pretty well the amount of converts to islam aswell as the "superior food" and extra time for "unsupervised prayers" among other benefits.
According to home office research, Around 30% of Muslim inmates are converts and most of those converted tend to be black rather than asian. In 1999, it was found that 37% of Muslim male prisoners were black compared with 7% of those in the wider population.
In general less than 1% of Black Caribbeans are Muslims but in jail the figure is almost 19%.
11% of prisoners in Britain describe themselves as muslim. Considering the religion only represents 3% of the British population a very high proportion of prisoners are muslims.
Also true is that Muslims are more likely to be unemployed or economically inactive than those in any other religious group.
Monday, 7 June 2010
No Inquiry into 7/7 Bombings in Order to Protect Muslims from criticism
There was no official inquiry into the 7/7 Islamist terrorist attacks in London because the Government took a deliberate decision to protect the Muslim community from scrutiny, it has been revealed.
A series of documents released by the Home Office shows that senior civil servants and government officials agreed on the conspiracy of silence in order not to draw attention to the reasons why Muslims in Britain would commit such attacks.
According to the papers released under a Freedom of Information Act request, Home Office permanent secretary Sir John Gieve wrote in a paper sent to then Home Secretary Charles Clarke that upsetting Muslims would be a "potential cost" of ministers agreeing to demands for a full inquiry.
Mr Clarke agreed and a public inquiry was never held, allowing the Government and the Muslim community to avoid the obvious question of why the attack took place.
Mr Clarke agreed and a public inquiry was never held, allowing the Government and the Muslim community to avoid the obvious question of why the attack took place.
Instead, the Government issued a “timeline” report of the attacks, diverting attention away from the causes of the Muslim behaviour.This was exactly the same tactic employed in America following the 9/11 terrorist attacks: the “investigation” focussed merely on the events themselves and not the reason why a group of Egyptians would seek to attack New York’s World Trade Centre
Source www.bnp.org.uk
Migrationwatch -conservative backed “Points Immigration System” is a complete failure
Despite giving cautious backing to the Conservative Party during the recent election, immigration think tank Migrationwatch has now been forced to admit that the Labour Party-invented and Tory-backed points-based immigration system has completely failed.
Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green attacked the points-based system in public after a House of Commons library research paper revealed that the system had given more than 1.1 million jobs to immigrants who could have been refused work permits.
“So much for the ‘tough’ points-based system,” Sir Andrew was quoted as saying.
“This research shows beyond doubt that British workers have been displaced by foreign-born workers. This cannot be in our wider interests.
“British workers are having their wages held down or even losing their jobs as a result of competition from migrant workers who can afford to work for less,” Sir Andrew said.
According to the latest figures, the number of non-EU origin workers in Britain increased even during the worst of the recession period when British unemployment rose by more than 400,000.
Between 1997 and 2009, the number of jobs held by foreign-born workers in Britain went up from 7.5 percent to 12.9 percent and now stands at around 3,720,000 of the total. Only 576,000 of this latter number came from within the EU.
This means that 3.2 million came from outside the EU and, to make matters worse, it transpires that 1,130,000 were granted work permits under the points-based system.
Migrationwatch chairman Sir Andrew Green attacked the points-based system in public after a House of Commons library research paper revealed that the system had given more than 1.1 million jobs to immigrants who could have been refused work permits.
“So much for the ‘tough’ points-based system,” Sir Andrew was quoted as saying.
“This research shows beyond doubt that British workers have been displaced by foreign-born workers. This cannot be in our wider interests.
“British workers are having their wages held down or even losing their jobs as a result of competition from migrant workers who can afford to work for less,” Sir Andrew said.
According to the latest figures, the number of non-EU origin workers in Britain increased even during the worst of the recession period when British unemployment rose by more than 400,000.
Between 1997 and 2009, the number of jobs held by foreign-born workers in Britain went up from 7.5 percent to 12.9 percent and now stands at around 3,720,000 of the total. Only 576,000 of this latter number came from within the EU.
This means that 3.2 million came from outside the EU and, to make matters worse, it transpires that 1,130,000 were granted work permits under the points-based system.
Fin this article in full at www.bnp.org.uk
Gordon Brown ignored uk immigration warnings
Former prime minister Gordon Brown was told not to brush concerns about UK immigration “under the carpet” and that the scale of the error was apparent after the disastrous encounter with the Labour voter Gillian Duffy.
“I said to him that he should have been talking immigration for the last year and a half and it was a mistake to brush it under the carpet,” the union-backed Labour leadership contender said.
“What Mrs Duffy said is what Labour supporters and other have been saying for the last year and a half. Mrs Duffy wasn’t raising a race point, she was talking about jobs and education. If we don’t respond to those concerns we will pay a very high price,” he said.
Mr Balls has called for an end to the free UK immigration of workers from the EU saying that means re-examining the relationship between domestic laws and European rules which allow unaccompanied migrants to send child benefit and tax credits back to families at home.
The UK immigration minister Damian Green has accused Mr Balls of hypocrisy, as he was at the Treasury in 2004 when the department pushed through the Labour Party’s open-door UK immigration policy.
“What Mrs Duffy said is what Labour supporters and other have been saying for the last year and a half. Mrs Duffy wasn’t raising a race point, she was talking about jobs and education. If we don’t respond to those concerns we will pay a very high price,” he said.
Mr Balls has called for an end to the free UK immigration of workers from the EU saying that means re-examining the relationship between domestic laws and European rules which allow unaccompanied migrants to send child benefit and tax credits back to families at home.
The UK immigration minister Damian Green has accused Mr Balls of hypocrisy, as he was at the Treasury in 2004 when the department pushed through the Labour Party’s open-door UK immigration policy.
Geert Wilders - Freedom Party set to double it's seats in Dutch election
The Freedom party, which has campaigned for ending the "Islamic invasion", is expected to double its representation in the Dutch parliament, giving it enough seats to become a potential ruling coalition candidate.
The party, which currently holds 9 seats, is predicted to double the amount to 18.
Led by MP Geert Wilders, the party claims that 40 per cent of social security payments go to non-Western immigrants and that people of Moroccan origin are suspected of committing crime five times more often than the indigenous Dutch.
"Every day we are confronted with mass immigration: headscarves, burqas, minarets, social security dependence, crime ... it never ends," he laments as dramatic music plays in the background of the clip released ahead of June 9 parliamentary elections.
"Whole neighbourhoods are being Islamised." says Mr Wilders.
"Whole neighbourhoods are being Islamised." says Mr Wilders.
Britons link islam with extremism according to survey
Most people in Britain link Islam with extremism and the repression of women, a survey has found.
The online YouGov poll just under 60% of those questioned associated Islam with extremism while almost 70% believed it encouraged the repression of women.
The survey of 2,152 adults was commissioned by the Exploring Islam Foundation.
The survey of 2,152 adults was commissioned by the Exploring Islam Foundation.
When asked if Muslims had a positive role in British society, just 6 out of 10 agreed with the statement. - wow 6 in 10 need to re-ajust their reality goggles. if that's the case -
More than half linked Islam with terrorism, only 13% thought it was based on peace and 6% associated it with justice.
Read more > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10251827.stm
Sunday, 6 June 2010
Council defends it's 'non-whites only' job
Bristol City council is offering a job that white people are not allowed to apply for.
The advert for two-year management training contract, worth almost £20,000 says only people from an ethnic minority are allowed to apply.
The council has defended it's actions saying it was well in it's legal right to do so.
One man (who was white) wanted to apply for the job but then saw he couldn't because of his skin colour, said
The advert for two-year management training contract, worth almost £20,000 says only people from an ethnic minority are allowed to apply.
The council has defended it's actions saying it was well in it's legal right to do so.
One man (who was white) wanted to apply for the job but then saw he couldn't because of his skin colour, said
"I am a tolerant white person who has lived in Bristol for 27 years. I am currently searching for a job and stumbled across a job advertisement on Bristol City Council's website that I see as totally racist. I feel the job itself would be an excellent opportunity for me to make use of the skills and qualifications that I have acquired. However, being white I am totally excluded from applying for the post."
You may also be interested in the following article >
BBC found to be actively discriminating against white people,
found on the following link >
Whilst Britain braces itself for a "painful" spending cut, the government approves a £100 million foreign aid package to Gaza
Prime Minister David Cameron has told Britain to brace itself for a "painful" cut in domestic spending, whilst at the same time his government approves a £100 million foreign aid package to Gaza.
University places are to be cut by atleast 10,000.
Other cuts include: The education budget (£670 million), Business (£836 million),
The Transport budget (£683 million), Communities and Local Government (£780 million),
and Justice (£325 million).
Non of these cuts will affect the £9.1 billion foreign aid budget, which the government has also promised to increase to £13 billion in due course. source www.bnp.org.uk
University places are to be cut by atleast 10,000.
Other cuts include: The education budget (£670 million), Business (£836 million),
The Transport budget (£683 million), Communities and Local Government (£780 million),
and Justice (£325 million).
Non of these cuts will affect the £9.1 billion foreign aid budget, which the government has also promised to increase to £13 billion in due course. source www.bnp.org.uk
Saturday, 5 June 2010
A NEW WAVE OF MIGRANTS WIN THE RIGHT TO FLOOD UK
BRITAIN has been warned to expect a new wave of immigration from Eastern Europe after half a million Ukrainians and Serbians were given the right to live, work and claim benefits in the UK.
Rules passed by the Hungarian parliament means that anyone who can speak the nation’s language or prove they have Hungarian roots can become a citizen and get a full EU passport.
Read more >
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/178357/New-wave-of-migrants-win-right-to-flood-UK
BBC Found to be actively Discriminating against White People
The BBC has been found to be actively discriminating against white people on it's BBC journalism trainee scheme, According to a Freedom of Information request.
The total number of places available was 51, for which some 5,816 people had applied. Of the 51 selected, 24, or 47 percent, were non-white applicants.
Potential selectees also had their photographs taken, so that their race could be taken into account when applicants would be chosen.
On top of all that, candidates were also asked if they had “experience in writing stories that would appeal to people from different racial backgrounds" - Obviously an unfair disadvantage for non ethnic minorities.
source www.bnp.org.uk
Anti-Terrorism CCTV cameras in muslim areas, proves BNP position right
Anti-terrorism CCTV cameras in the Muslim areas in Birmingham has confirmed the BNP is right in it's explanation of the cause of terrorism in Britain
The British National Party has pointed out in the past that mass immigration and biased British foreign policy would cause a rise in home born British islamic terrorists.
The CCTV cameras have been installed in Washwood Heath and Sparkbrook at a cost of £3 million.
The 150 cameras consist of a combination of automatic number plate reading cameras and sophisticated tracking devices which are still classified, and at least 40 of the 150 cameras are classified as "covert" which means they are hidden from public view.
Read more > http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jun/04/birmingham-surveillance-cameras-muslim-community
The British National Party has pointed out in the past that mass immigration and biased British foreign policy would cause a rise in home born British islamic terrorists.
The CCTV cameras have been installed in Washwood Heath and Sparkbrook at a cost of £3 million.
The 150 cameras consist of a combination of automatic number plate reading cameras and sophisticated tracking devices which are still classified, and at least 40 of the 150 cameras are classified as "covert" which means they are hidden from public view.
Read more > http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jun/04/birmingham-surveillance-cameras-muslim-community
UK Council spends £150,000 so Muslim graves can face Mecca
Another local authority pandering to the local muslim community. No suprises there then.
Read more > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7803133/councill-spends-150000-so-muslim-graves-can-face-mecca.html
Read more > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/7803133/councill-spends-150000-so-muslim-graves-can-face-mecca.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)