Muslim bus drivers refuse to let blind people with guide dogs on board

Blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their 'unclean' guide dogs.
One pensioner, a cancer sufferer, told how had twice been confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog, and had also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
The problem to carry guide dogs on religious grounds has become so widespread that the matter was raised in the House of Lords last week, prompting transport minister Norman Baker to warn that a religious objection was not a reason to eject a passenger with a well-behaved guide dog.

While drivers can use their discretion to refuse to carry non-disabled passengers with dogs, they are compelled to accept guide dogs under disability discrimination law.
Yesterday both the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the National Federation of the Blind confirmed the problem was common, and, according to the latter organisation was 'getting worse'.
The tension stems from a strand of Islamic teaching which warns against contact with dogs because the animal's saliva was considered to be impure, the Muslim Council of Britain said.
It urged Muslims to show tolerance and common sense over the issue.
'We need to be flexible on this,' a spokesman said. 'Muslim drivers should have no hesitation in allowing guide dogs into their bus or car.
'If a dog does lick you, it's not the end of the world. Just go home and wash yourself.'
George Herridge, 73, a retired hospital maintenance manager, told the Daily Mail he was 'stunned' to be twice asked by bus drivers to leave their vehicles because of his guide dog Andy, a black Labrador.
Mr Herridge, who lives with wife Janet, 69, in Tilehurst, Reading, said that on the first occasion two years ago, he got off at the request of a Muslim driver because some Muslim children on board were 'screaming' because of the dog.
He found himself in a similar scenario in May last year, when a Muslim woman and her children became 'hysterical'. Mr Herridge this time refused the driver's request to alight.
He complained to the bus company which launched an investigation. It later informed him the matter had been dealt with 'internally'.
Jill Allen-King, spokesman for the NFB, said she had been repeatedly left on the kerb by Muslim taxi drivers who refused to take her dog.
One cab driver told her he would have to 'go home now and wash myself' when she tried to enter his car with her dog.
Mr Baker yesterday warned bus and cab companies that, while there were within their rights to ask a passenger to leave if the dog was causing a nuisance, it was 'much more questionable to be asked to remove a dog for religious reasons'.
He added: 'One person's freedom is someone else's restriction.'
In 2006, Muslim minicab driver Abdul Rasheed Majekodumni was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 costs by magistrates in Marylebone, central London, after being prosecuted for failing to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act when he refused to take a blind passenger because her guide dog was 'unclean'.

500 Staff and £40,000 on Chauffeur Fees: This Is the Organisation That Seeks to Destroy the BNP and the British indigenous people

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has a staff of over 500 and its Lenin-worshipping immigrant-origin boss spent £40,000 of taxpayers’ money to ferry him seven miles a day to his office, a financial review of that organisation has revealed.
EHCR head Trevor Phillips, already dogged by accusations of waste, mismanagement and blatant political interference in staff appointments, is said to be staggering under the weight of the new allegations which reveal precisely how outrageous his own personal “expense” claims are.
Despite earning £120,000 for this made-up race Gestapo job, Mr Phillips claimed more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to take him each day from his home in north London to the EHRC’s office near London Bridge.
The journey takes approximately 25 minutes, which is only ten minutes faster than a commute on public transport which would cost a few hundred pounds per year at most.
The embarrassed Mr Phillips, who used to boast about the bust of Lenin he kept on his desk, only stopped using the chauffeur car in May after he realised the review had cottoned on to his little earner.
The report, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject EHRC management failings.
Earlier, Mr Phillips was the subject of a wave of criticism and attacks from within his own organisation.
Amongst the allegations made against Mr Phillips were that he had “lost the faith of minority groups” and that he had “played the race card to stay in post.”
Last year, one EHRC commissioner, Kay Hampton, resigned in protest after saying that Mr Phillips had said his enemies were trying to oust him because he was a “black man.”
“Nobody is prepared to challenge Trevor for fear of being accused of racism. He has already played the race card in the commission,” Ms Hampton said.
The Liberal Democrat’s “Lord” Dholakia was also quoted as saying that “Mr Phillips has lost the confidence of the black and Asian community.”
Amongst the long list of shady EHRC dealings include the revelation that it unlawfully awarded a £300,000 contract to a company run by one of Mr Phillips' close professional friends.
Juniper TV, a company headed by Dr Samir Shah, who has known Phillips since they worked at LWT in the 1980, was awarded a contract in 2007 to produce My Story, a 30-minute video in which the public and celebrities talked about "difference."
An internal audit found EU procurement rules had not been followed, concerning whether or not the tender for the project should have been advertised across Europe.
The EHRC’s commissioners earn an annual salary of more than £100,000 each.
And this is the organisation which has set as its goal the destruction of the British National Party, all because the BNP is the only political party which dares to stand up for the rights of the indigenous people of these islands.

Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics

Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics

The utter failure of multiculturalism and the anti-white paranoia which it engenders has been illustrated once again with an internal report from one of Britain’s major intelligence agencies which blames whites for the unwillingness of ethnics to spy on their own people.
GCHQ: Apparently a nest of racists?According to a review of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) which is the centre for the Government's Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) activities, there are “too few” ethnic staff members and the reason for this is, of course, the ubiquitous “racism” of white staff members.
According to reports, the “Capability Review” was authorised by the head of the civil service, Sir Gus O'Donnell, and published in January. It has only now been leaked to the press.
The review claimed that anti-terrorism efforts are undermined by a failure to recruit “enough ethnic minority staff.”
Apparently GCHQ has a "very small pool" of black and Asian staff and all of their senior staff is white.
This is problematic because of the Islamist nature of the terrorist threat which Britain faces. As a result, most of the communications which are intercepted by GCHQ are in Urdu and Arabic.
A lack of officers with specialist knowledge of these languages is apparently “harming efforts to spot codes and cultural nuances in intercepted conversations.”
As is by now usual for the multicultural fanatics who make up the establishment, any excuse but the truth is created to try and explain this situation.
The simple, most obvious, and clearly truthful reason is that very few ethnics want to spy on their brethren, especially when all opinion polls, anecdotal evidence and public pronouncements from Muslim organisations show that there is a very large degree of sympathy for Islamists amongst the target communities.
Rather than admit this obvious truth, the brainwashed liberals running the establishment resorted instead to their old standby: blame whitey.
In a shockingly unfair attack on the white staff at the GCHQ in Cheltenham, the review said there was a “racist culture” in the organisation which prevented ethnics from joining.
One ethnic staff member’s bizarre “evidence” which was used as “proof” of this slur on the white staff was that “ethnic minority employees had to work harder than white colleagues and for less reward.”
This tactic of always blaming white people for everything when the true causes clearly lie elsewhere runs like a golden thread through the entire multicultural establishment’s reasoning.
If black people are stopped and searched more often than any other group by the police, it is not because they commit more crime, but because the “the police are racist.”
If ethnics are jailed more often than whites, it is not because they commit more crime, but it is because the “judicial system is racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in schools or universities, it is because “educational institutions are racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in jobs, it is because “employers are racist.” The list is endless.
And now, because ethnics do not want to spy on their own communities, it is because the “white staff at GCHQ are racist.”
This nonsense has to stop before it utterly destroys Britain. Only the British National Party dares to stand up and opposed this politically correct anti-white Marxist claptrap.

Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag

Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag

British taxpayers, already facing huge tax hikes to fund the Lib-Lab-Con’s disastrous economic and social policies, have been saddled with £150 million in fines for the failure to fly the EU flag in our country.
The shocking news emerged last week when the European Commission’s bureaucrats issued the fines in terms of little known regulations which say that the EU flag must be flown at all projects partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
In addition to the failure to fly the EU flag on these “EU-funded” projects, several British-based operations were also fined for failing to use the EU flag on their letterheads.
The projects named included the Eden Project in Cornwall, the Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, and the redevelopment of Liverpool’s King’s Dock.
The ridiculousness of the situation is accentuated by the fact that this “funding” is, in fact, UK tax money in the first place.
Britain is only paid back seven out of every ten pounds paid into the European superstate.
If that was not bad enough, all ERDF funding has to be matched pound for pound by Government cash. In essence then, the ERDF merely gobbles up British tax money, keeps a huge chunk for itself and gives a pittance back, which then has to be matched by the British taxpayer once again.
It would obviously be far cheaper to fund all of these projects directly from the Treasury, a simple fact which escapes the dunces in the Lib-Lab-Con party.
This year alone, Britain will contribute £6.4 billion more to Brussels than it receives back.
According to the ERDF website, Britain has received a total of £5 billion of ERDF funding since 2000, which puts this year’s payments into perspective.
According to the Bruges Group, the cost of Britain’s membership of the EU is as follows:
- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.
- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net, by 2013 this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.
- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.
- Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.
- That is the equivalent for every man, woman and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.

Cover-up of Ethnic Cleansing Most Likely Reason for Abolition of National Census

An attempt to suppress statistics which reveal the steady ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population of Britain is the most likely reason for the ConDem regime’s shock announcement that the national census is to be abandoned.
The Domesday Book, 1066Although Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude has cited expense as the reason to abolish the decennial census, this undertaking “only” costs £482 million to complete.
This is minor when it is considered that MPs in Westminster claim an average of £92 million per year in expenses alone and indicates that there is an alternative “real” reason for the move to abolish the census.
A news report quoted constitutional barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC as saying that “future historians will be less able to interpret Britain as a result of this decision — maybe that is the reason for it.”
Mr Robertson has hit the nail on the head. The census figures are definitive proof of the steady replacement of the indigenous population of Britain by a tsunami of Third World immigrants, encouraged and abetted by the Con-Lib-Lab party.
Mr Maude said that the census will be replaced by “regular checks on numbers using existing databases such as post office records and the electoral roll.”
Using these figures will effectively hide the changing racial demographics, as was recently well illustrated in the Barking constituency in London.
In that region, thousands of Africans were added to the voters’ roll, which in turn generated the illusion that “British” people had endorsed the Labour Party in overwhelming numbers in that area.
In reality, as all people on the ground there know, the vast majority of the remaining indigenous population support the British National Party, and the huge numbers of Third World immigrants support Labour.
To base census figures on voters' rolls will deny historians, statisticians and political scientists the ability to measure demographic change through immigration.
Given these factors, the reason behind the move to abolish the census becomes clear: it is a move by the ConDem regime to cover up its complicity in the extinction of the British people in their homeland.
* The 2011 census will still go ahead, according to reports. A national census of Britain goes back over 1,000 years to the time of the Domesday Book of 1066. The decennial census was first introduced 200 years ago during the Victorian era.

How Globalists Use Mass Immigration To Destroy Cultures

Outrageous Liberal Woman calls for Sharia 'islamic' law to be implemente...

Britain's Multicultural Treachery

Islamisation of France continues: Super-Mosque to be built In Marseille

BNP: No Go Areas in the UK.

Five years after 7/7 attacks: UK terror threat remains high

Radio RWB - BNP NICK GRIFFIN - EU INTERVIEW 05 07 2010 1/2

How British People Are Put Last on the Social Housing Queue

British people are always put last on social housing queues behind immigrants because they are invariable already classed as “accommodated” as they live with other family members, a whistleblower has told the Daily Mail.
In a shocking inside story, the Daily Mail today published a long interview with a whistleblower working inside a social house agency in London.
The whistleblower, codenamed “Chris,” lifted the lid on how immigrants are ruthlessly exploiting the social housing system.
According to the interview, the social housing system is “designed to help the destitute” but is being abused by “undeserving chancers and cheats.”
The interview then goes on to describe in detail one of the many cases with which Chris had to deal, including that of a recently arrived Somali family who did not want a three story £1 million mansion in central London because it did not come with an automatic right-to-buy discount.
“I thought that question was a bit odd, considering the family supposedly didn't have a penny to their name, which was why they were throwing themselves on the mercy of the good old British taxpayer.
“Where would they get the funds to buy a townhouse in central London? This 'penniless' family also wanted to know whether they got a residents' parking space with the property.
“I had to tell them 'No' to that as well. They shrugged and spread their arms, as if to say: 'How on earth do you expect us to live here? Why are you wasting our time dragging us here?' And off they went,” Chris told the newspaper.
The whistleblower also revealed out the system “rewards those family members who have just stepped off a plane by giving them a wonderful property in a central location, while Britons who have been here for years or even generations have got no chance of getting to the top of the list.”
Chris explained that this is because “British applicants tend to be already living with family — parents, etc. — so technically qualify as being housed. Recent arrivals with kids in tow do not and are given priority.”
He also revealed that a big problem amongst Turkish abusers of the system is that they want properties where they can erect large satellite dishes to watch Turkish TV.
“How are they paying for it? Tenants who are supposedly on the breadline often have luxury goods like plasma TVs,” Chris said.
“Properties with open-plan kitchens can be a problem too, as Somalian or other Muslim 'customers' often don't want a kitchen that opens straight on to a reception room, and these type of houses are always turned down.
“I was given the reason by one man: If he wanted to invite other men around to play cards or whatever, he didn't want them to see his wife making food in the kitchen.
The full shocking interview, which contains many more examples of how Third World immigrants are ripping off the system, can be found here.

Police Investigate BNP Man’s Complaints Against UAF’s George Galloway

Police have confirmed that they are “compiling evidence” after West Wales British National Party deputy organiser Mike Green lodged a formal complaint against the UAF’s George Galloway following an inflammatory speech made in London last month.
Mr Green laid the complaint with the police after viewing YouTube video copies of the speech by Mr Galloway given at a UAF rally in east London in which an overt threat of violence was made.
During the speech, Mr Galloway warned that anybody who “dare[d] touch a hijab [hair cover] on a Muslim woman’s head, if you dare touch the hair on the beard of a Muslim man in Tower Hamlets, you will have to fight your way through 10,000 dead bodies first.”
Mr Green’s complaint with the Metropolitan Police was backed up by at least a dozen similar complaints organised through a Facebook campaign.
The police have video footage of the former Glasgow MP, who is a founding member of the Respect Party, telling the rally: “To the EDL, take a look around you boys. Take a look around you.
Footage of Mr Galloway’s speech has appeared online at YouTube under the heading: “Why half a million Brits vote BNP. George Galloway incites race violence.”
UAF posters in the Muslim crowd.The London rally at which the speech was made was organised by anti-BNP organisation “Unite Against Fascism” and their trademark purple anti-BNP posters were widespread amongst the 3,000 strong Muslim crowd in attendance.
UAF secretary general Weyman Bennett was arrested in March this year by police and charged with suspicion of conspiracy to commit violent disorder.
Despite Mr Bennett being an active executive member of the extremist far left Socialist Workers Party, David Cameron is a founding signatory member of the UAF.
Mr Cameron is joined by MPs and MEPs from both Lib Dems and Labour in his allegiance to the UAF organisation which, as Mr Galloway’s speech has confirmed, is little more than a front to assist the Islamic colonisation of Britain.

We have not learnt the lesson of the July 7 suicide bombing

In the five years since suicide bombers killed 52 people in London, placatory government policy on Islamist terrorism has achieved little but store up trouble for the future.

Today marks the fifth anniversary of the day suicide bombing came to Britain. On July 7, 2005 three young British-born men exploded their devices simultaneously on the London Underground. A fourth man detonated his an hour later on a bus in Tavistock Square. Together they left 52 people dead, many more injured.

Muslim hate preacher and the former head of banned group Al-Muhajiroun, Anjem Choudary has warned that Britain faces more home-grown terror attacks like 7/7."The British public had failed to learn the lessons of the 2005 atrocity that killed 52 innocent people," Choudary, was quoted as saying.Today is the fifth anniversary of the suicide attacks that killed 52 people and hurt hundreds more."The public has not made progress to avoid another calamity befalling them. Rather, more fuel is being poured on to the fire. Unless the British withdraw all troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, no doubt we can expect more of the same," he added.

Choudary, whose Islamic group Islam4UK was banned after public outcry at his plans to protest at Wootton Bassett, said the key to avoiding attacks was in the hands of the Government.

A school forced to buy computer translator because half of its pupils can't speak English

A primary school where more than half of pupils are non-English speaking has become the first in Britain to give every child a computerised translator.
Around 60 per cent of the 384 pupils at Manor Park Primary School in Aston, Birmingham, now communicate with teachers using the software.
Pupils type in questions into the computer using their native language which is then translated verbally into English for the teacher.Read more.
In reverse, teachers' words can be translated back into 25 different languages.
The primary school is the first in Britain to give the 'Talking Tutor' computer software to every pupil.
English-speaking students also use the translator in order to communicate with their foreign classmates. Headteacher Jason Smith said the technology was 'invaluable'.
He said: 'This is a tool. It is not a replacement. It is the sort of tool that we can use to engage with children who have recently arrived in the country and have very little spoken English.
'It can vary, but at any one time we have 30 plus languages being spoken at the school, so this is invaluable to us.
'Last week we enrolled a pupils from Gambia who could only speak a tribal language, so we checked online to see if we had something that closely matched it.
'We found the closest match and both the child and their parent could understand us.'

The school pays £700 per annum for the software which comes with on-screen avatars based on the ethnic background of the pupils. The avatars includes an Asian man, a white Eastern European and a black African man.
Plans are also in the pipeline to include a Chinese woman avatar and there are even proposals to develop a Burka-wearing Muslim.
The software, developed by Lincoln-based firm EMAS Uk cost more than £2.5 million to produce.
It verbally translates English into 25 languages including Polish, Urdu, Pakistani and Chinese. A further 200 languages can be translated on-screen for pupils to read.
Chris Pickles, director of EMAS UK, said: 'The technology enables non-English speaking pupils to feel more understood and to understand more.
'Manor Park Primary School is a centre of excellence for using this tool and is the first in Britain to have Talking Tutor in every class.'
To avoid embarrassing misunderstandings, the computer programme comes with a contexual engine which translates the meaning of the message rather than a word-for-word translation.
The school started using the translator - which is 95 per cent accurate - in every classroom two weeks ago.
Mr Smith said: 'Just because English isn't a pupil's first language, it doesn't mean that they aren't academically gifted, so this allows us to assess them in their own language while helping them with their English at the same time.'
The latest figures from the Department for Education show 905,610 children in the UK do not speak English as their first language - a rise of 42,750 since last year.
In Tower Hamlets, east London, 78 per cent of children are non-English speakers - the highest area in the UK.

Australia to ban the burqa? - MP defends burka ban legislation

The Latest Goings On In islamic Britain.