Wednesday, 8 September 2010
Saturday, 21 August 2010
Monday, 19 July 2010
Muslim bus drivers refuse to let blind people with guide dogs on board
Blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their 'unclean' guide dogs.
One pensioner, a cancer sufferer, told how had twice been confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog, and had also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
The problem to carry guide dogs on religious grounds has become so widespread that the matter was raised in the House of Lords last week, prompting transport minister Norman Baker to warn that a religious objection was not a reason to eject a passenger with a well-behaved guide dog.
One pensioner, a cancer sufferer, told how had twice been confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog, and had also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.
The problem to carry guide dogs on religious grounds has become so widespread that the matter was raised in the House of Lords last week, prompting transport minister Norman Baker to warn that a religious objection was not a reason to eject a passenger with a well-behaved guide dog.
While drivers can use their discretion to refuse to carry non-disabled passengers with dogs, they are compelled to accept guide dogs under disability discrimination law.
Yesterday both the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the National Federation of the Blind confirmed the problem was common, and, according to the latter organisation was 'getting worse'.
The tension stems from a strand of Islamic teaching which warns against contact with dogs because the animal's saliva was considered to be impure, the Muslim Council of Britain said.
It urged Muslims to show tolerance and common sense over the issue.
'We need to be flexible on this,' a spokesman said. 'Muslim drivers should have no hesitation in allowing guide dogs into their bus or car.
'If a dog does lick you, it's not the end of the world. Just go home and wash yourself.'
George Herridge, 73, a retired hospital maintenance manager, told the Daily Mail he was 'stunned' to be twice asked by bus drivers to leave their vehicles because of his guide dog Andy, a black Labrador.
Mr Herridge, who lives with wife Janet, 69, in Tilehurst, Reading, said that on the first occasion two years ago, he got off at the request of a Muslim driver because some Muslim children on board were 'screaming' because of the dog.
He found himself in a similar scenario in May last year, when a Muslim woman and her children became 'hysterical'. Mr Herridge this time refused the driver's request to alight.
He complained to the bus company which launched an investigation. It later informed him the matter had been dealt with 'internally'.
Jill Allen-King, spokesman for the NFB, said she had been repeatedly left on the kerb by Muslim taxi drivers who refused to take her dog.
One cab driver told her he would have to 'go home now and wash myself' when she tried to enter his car with her dog.
Mr Baker yesterday warned bus and cab companies that, while there were within their rights to ask a passenger to leave if the dog was causing a nuisance, it was 'much more questionable to be asked to remove a dog for religious reasons'.
He added: 'One person's freedom is someone else's restriction.'
In 2006, Muslim minicab driver Abdul Rasheed Majekodumni was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 costs by magistrates in Marylebone, central London, after being prosecuted for failing to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act when he refused to take a blind passenger because her guide dog was 'unclean'.
Yesterday both the Guide Dogs for the Blind Association and the National Federation of the Blind confirmed the problem was common, and, according to the latter organisation was 'getting worse'.
The tension stems from a strand of Islamic teaching which warns against contact with dogs because the animal's saliva was considered to be impure, the Muslim Council of Britain said.
It urged Muslims to show tolerance and common sense over the issue.
'We need to be flexible on this,' a spokesman said. 'Muslim drivers should have no hesitation in allowing guide dogs into their bus or car.
'If a dog does lick you, it's not the end of the world. Just go home and wash yourself.'
George Herridge, 73, a retired hospital maintenance manager, told the Daily Mail he was 'stunned' to be twice asked by bus drivers to leave their vehicles because of his guide dog Andy, a black Labrador.
Mr Herridge, who lives with wife Janet, 69, in Tilehurst, Reading, said that on the first occasion two years ago, he got off at the request of a Muslim driver because some Muslim children on board were 'screaming' because of the dog.
He found himself in a similar scenario in May last year, when a Muslim woman and her children became 'hysterical'. Mr Herridge this time refused the driver's request to alight.
He complained to the bus company which launched an investigation. It later informed him the matter had been dealt with 'internally'.
Jill Allen-King, spokesman for the NFB, said she had been repeatedly left on the kerb by Muslim taxi drivers who refused to take her dog.
One cab driver told her he would have to 'go home now and wash myself' when she tried to enter his car with her dog.
Mr Baker yesterday warned bus and cab companies that, while there were within their rights to ask a passenger to leave if the dog was causing a nuisance, it was 'much more questionable to be asked to remove a dog for religious reasons'.
He added: 'One person's freedom is someone else's restriction.'
In 2006, Muslim minicab driver Abdul Rasheed Majekodumni was fined £200 and ordered to pay £1,200 costs by magistrates in Marylebone, central London, after being prosecuted for failing to comply with the Disability Discrimination Act when he refused to take a blind passenger because her guide dog was 'unclean'.
Sunday, 18 July 2010
500 Staff and £40,000 on Chauffeur Fees: This Is the Organisation That Seeks to Destroy the BNP and the British indigenous people
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has a staff of over 500 and its Lenin-worshipping immigrant-origin boss spent £40,000 of taxpayers’ money to ferry him seven miles a day to his office, a financial review of that organisation has revealed.
EHCR head Trevor Phillips, already dogged by accusations of waste, mismanagement and blatant political interference in staff appointments, is said to be staggering under the weight of the new allegations which reveal precisely how outrageous his own personal “expense” claims are.
Despite earning £120,000 for this made-up race Gestapo job, Mr Phillips claimed more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to take him each day from his home in north London to the EHRC’s office near London Bridge.
The journey takes approximately 25 minutes, which is only ten minutes faster than a commute on public transport which would cost a few hundred pounds per year at most.
The embarrassed Mr Phillips, who used to boast about the bust of Lenin he kept on his desk, only stopped using the chauffeur car in May after he realised the review had cottoned on to his little earner.
The report, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject EHRC management failings.
Earlier, Mr Phillips was the subject of a wave of criticism and attacks from within his own organisation.
Amongst the allegations made against Mr Phillips were that he had “lost the faith of minority groups” and that he had “played the race card to stay in post.”
Last year, one EHRC commissioner, Kay Hampton, resigned in protest after saying that Mr Phillips had said his enemies were trying to oust him because he was a “black man.”
“Nobody is prepared to challenge Trevor for fear of being accused of racism. He has already played the race card in the commission,” Ms Hampton said.
The Liberal Democrat’s “Lord” Dholakia was also quoted as saying that “Mr Phillips has lost the confidence of the black and Asian community.”
Amongst the long list of shady EHRC dealings include the revelation that it unlawfully awarded a £300,000 contract to a company run by one of Mr Phillips' close professional friends.
Juniper TV, a company headed by Dr Samir Shah, who has known Phillips since they worked at LWT in the 1980, was awarded a contract in 2007 to produce My Story, a 30-minute video in which the public and celebrities talked about "difference."
An internal audit found EU procurement rules had not been followed, concerning whether or not the tender for the project should have been advertised across Europe.
The EHRC’s commissioners earn an annual salary of more than £100,000 each.
And this is the organisation which has set as its goal the destruction of the British National Party, all because the BNP is the only political party which dares to stand up for the rights of the indigenous people of these islands.
EHCR head Trevor Phillips, already dogged by accusations of waste, mismanagement and blatant political interference in staff appointments, is said to be staggering under the weight of the new allegations which reveal precisely how outrageous his own personal “expense” claims are.
Despite earning £120,000 for this made-up race Gestapo job, Mr Phillips claimed more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to take him each day from his home in north London to the EHRC’s office near London Bridge.
The journey takes approximately 25 minutes, which is only ten minutes faster than a commute on public transport which would cost a few hundred pounds per year at most.
The embarrassed Mr Phillips, who used to boast about the bust of Lenin he kept on his desk, only stopped using the chauffeur car in May after he realised the review had cottoned on to his little earner.
The report, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject EHRC management failings.
Earlier, Mr Phillips was the subject of a wave of criticism and attacks from within his own organisation.
Amongst the allegations made against Mr Phillips were that he had “lost the faith of minority groups” and that he had “played the race card to stay in post.”
Last year, one EHRC commissioner, Kay Hampton, resigned in protest after saying that Mr Phillips had said his enemies were trying to oust him because he was a “black man.”
“Nobody is prepared to challenge Trevor for fear of being accused of racism. He has already played the race card in the commission,” Ms Hampton said.
The Liberal Democrat’s “Lord” Dholakia was also quoted as saying that “Mr Phillips has lost the confidence of the black and Asian community.”
Amongst the long list of shady EHRC dealings include the revelation that it unlawfully awarded a £300,000 contract to a company run by one of Mr Phillips' close professional friends.
Juniper TV, a company headed by Dr Samir Shah, who has known Phillips since they worked at LWT in the 1980, was awarded a contract in 2007 to produce My Story, a 30-minute video in which the public and celebrities talked about "difference."
An internal audit found EU procurement rules had not been followed, concerning whether or not the tender for the project should have been advertised across Europe.
The EHRC’s commissioners earn an annual salary of more than £100,000 each.
And this is the organisation which has set as its goal the destruction of the British National Party, all because the BNP is the only political party which dares to stand up for the rights of the indigenous people of these islands.
Sunday, 11 July 2010
Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics
Whites Blamed because Ethnics Do Not Want to Spy on Other Ethnics
The utter failure of multiculturalism and the anti-white paranoia which it engenders has been illustrated once again with an internal report from one of Britain’s major intelligence agencies which blames whites for the unwillingness of ethnics to spy on their own people.
GCHQ: Apparently a nest of racists?According to a review of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) which is the centre for the Government's Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) activities, there are “too few” ethnic staff members and the reason for this is, of course, the ubiquitous “racism” of white staff members.
According to reports, the “Capability Review” was authorised by the head of the civil service, Sir Gus O'Donnell, and published in January. It has only now been leaked to the press.
The review claimed that anti-terrorism efforts are undermined by a failure to recruit “enough ethnic minority staff.”
Apparently GCHQ has a "very small pool" of black and Asian staff and all of their senior staff is white.
This is problematic because of the Islamist nature of the terrorist threat which Britain faces. As a result, most of the communications which are intercepted by GCHQ are in Urdu and Arabic.
A lack of officers with specialist knowledge of these languages is apparently “harming efforts to spot codes and cultural nuances in intercepted conversations.”
As is by now usual for the multicultural fanatics who make up the establishment, any excuse but the truth is created to try and explain this situation.
The simple, most obvious, and clearly truthful reason is that very few ethnics want to spy on their brethren, especially when all opinion polls, anecdotal evidence and public pronouncements from Muslim organisations show that there is a very large degree of sympathy for Islamists amongst the target communities.
Rather than admit this obvious truth, the brainwashed liberals running the establishment resorted instead to their old standby: blame whitey.
In a shockingly unfair attack on the white staff at the GCHQ in Cheltenham, the review said there was a “racist culture” in the organisation which prevented ethnics from joining.
One ethnic staff member’s bizarre “evidence” which was used as “proof” of this slur on the white staff was that “ethnic minority employees had to work harder than white colleagues and for less reward.”
This tactic of always blaming white people for everything when the true causes clearly lie elsewhere runs like a golden thread through the entire multicultural establishment’s reasoning.
If black people are stopped and searched more often than any other group by the police, it is not because they commit more crime, but because the “the police are racist.”
If ethnics are jailed more often than whites, it is not because they commit more crime, but it is because the “judicial system is racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in schools or universities, it is because “educational institutions are racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in jobs, it is because “employers are racist.” The list is endless.
And now, because ethnics do not want to spy on their own communities, it is because the “white staff at GCHQ are racist.”
This nonsense has to stop before it utterly destroys Britain. Only the British National Party dares to stand up and opposed this politically correct anti-white Marxist claptrap.
The utter failure of multiculturalism and the anti-white paranoia which it engenders has been illustrated once again with an internal report from one of Britain’s major intelligence agencies which blames whites for the unwillingness of ethnics to spy on their own people.
GCHQ: Apparently a nest of racists?According to a review of the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) which is the centre for the Government's Signal Intelligence (SIGINT) activities, there are “too few” ethnic staff members and the reason for this is, of course, the ubiquitous “racism” of white staff members.
According to reports, the “Capability Review” was authorised by the head of the civil service, Sir Gus O'Donnell, and published in January. It has only now been leaked to the press.
The review claimed that anti-terrorism efforts are undermined by a failure to recruit “enough ethnic minority staff.”
Apparently GCHQ has a "very small pool" of black and Asian staff and all of their senior staff is white.
This is problematic because of the Islamist nature of the terrorist threat which Britain faces. As a result, most of the communications which are intercepted by GCHQ are in Urdu and Arabic.
A lack of officers with specialist knowledge of these languages is apparently “harming efforts to spot codes and cultural nuances in intercepted conversations.”
As is by now usual for the multicultural fanatics who make up the establishment, any excuse but the truth is created to try and explain this situation.
The simple, most obvious, and clearly truthful reason is that very few ethnics want to spy on their brethren, especially when all opinion polls, anecdotal evidence and public pronouncements from Muslim organisations show that there is a very large degree of sympathy for Islamists amongst the target communities.
Rather than admit this obvious truth, the brainwashed liberals running the establishment resorted instead to their old standby: blame whitey.
In a shockingly unfair attack on the white staff at the GCHQ in Cheltenham, the review said there was a “racist culture” in the organisation which prevented ethnics from joining.
One ethnic staff member’s bizarre “evidence” which was used as “proof” of this slur on the white staff was that “ethnic minority employees had to work harder than white colleagues and for less reward.”
This tactic of always blaming white people for everything when the true causes clearly lie elsewhere runs like a golden thread through the entire multicultural establishment’s reasoning.
If black people are stopped and searched more often than any other group by the police, it is not because they commit more crime, but because the “the police are racist.”
If ethnics are jailed more often than whites, it is not because they commit more crime, but it is because the “judicial system is racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in schools or universities, it is because “educational institutions are racist.”
If ethnics do not do well in jobs, it is because “employers are racist.” The list is endless.
And now, because ethnics do not want to spy on their own communities, it is because the “white staff at GCHQ are racist.”
This nonsense has to stop before it utterly destroys Britain. Only the British National Party dares to stand up and opposed this politically correct anti-white Marxist claptrap.
Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag
Pay up Britons: EU Fines UK £150 Million for Not Flying the EU Flag
British taxpayers, already facing huge tax hikes to fund the Lib-Lab-Con’s disastrous economic and social policies, have been saddled with £150 million in fines for the failure to fly the EU flag in our country.
The shocking news emerged last week when the European Commission’s bureaucrats issued the fines in terms of little known regulations which say that the EU flag must be flown at all projects partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
In addition to the failure to fly the EU flag on these “EU-funded” projects, several British-based operations were also fined for failing to use the EU flag on their letterheads.
The projects named included the Eden Project in Cornwall, the Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, and the redevelopment of Liverpool’s King’s Dock.
The ridiculousness of the situation is accentuated by the fact that this “funding” is, in fact, UK tax money in the first place.
Britain is only paid back seven out of every ten pounds paid into the European superstate.
If that was not bad enough, all ERDF funding has to be matched pound for pound by Government cash. In essence then, the ERDF merely gobbles up British tax money, keeps a huge chunk for itself and gives a pittance back, which then has to be matched by the British taxpayer once again.
It would obviously be far cheaper to fund all of these projects directly from the Treasury, a simple fact which escapes the dunces in the Lib-Lab-Con party.
This year alone, Britain will contribute £6.4 billion more to Brussels than it receives back.
According to the ERDF website, Britain has received a total of £5 billion of ERDF funding since 2000, which puts this year’s payments into perspective.
According to the Bruges Group, the cost of Britain’s membership of the EU is as follows:
- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.
- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net, by 2013 this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.
- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.
- Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.
- That is the equivalent for every man, woman and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.
British taxpayers, already facing huge tax hikes to fund the Lib-Lab-Con’s disastrous economic and social policies, have been saddled with £150 million in fines for the failure to fly the EU flag in our country.
The shocking news emerged last week when the European Commission’s bureaucrats issued the fines in terms of little known regulations which say that the EU flag must be flown at all projects partly funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
In addition to the failure to fly the EU flag on these “EU-funded” projects, several British-based operations were also fined for failing to use the EU flag on their letterheads.
The projects named included the Eden Project in Cornwall, the Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, and the redevelopment of Liverpool’s King’s Dock.
The ridiculousness of the situation is accentuated by the fact that this “funding” is, in fact, UK tax money in the first place.
Britain is only paid back seven out of every ten pounds paid into the European superstate.
If that was not bad enough, all ERDF funding has to be matched pound for pound by Government cash. In essence then, the ERDF merely gobbles up British tax money, keeps a huge chunk for itself and gives a pittance back, which then has to be matched by the British taxpayer once again.
It would obviously be far cheaper to fund all of these projects directly from the Treasury, a simple fact which escapes the dunces in the Lib-Lab-Con party.
This year alone, Britain will contribute £6.4 billion more to Brussels than it receives back.
According to the ERDF website, Britain has received a total of £5 billion of ERDF funding since 2000, which puts this year’s payments into perspective.
According to the Bruges Group, the cost of Britain’s membership of the EU is as follows:
- Over-regulation costs Britain at least £26 billion per annum.
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £15.6 billion a year.
- Since 1973 the UK has made contributions to the EC budget of almost £213.6 billion gross or £66.3 billion net, by 2013 this figure will have increased to £299.8 billion gross, or £102.2 billion net.
- Britain's accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states since we joined has risen to £359.5 billion.
- Membership of the European Union costs Britain £60.1 billion gross, or £50.6 billion net.
- That is the equivalent for every man, woman and child in Britain of over £1,000 per year gross or £843 net.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)